2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.101.012325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beating direct transmission bounds for quantum key distribution with a multiple quantum memory station

Abstract: Overcoming repeaterless bounds for the secret key rate capacity of quantum key distribution protocols is still a challenge with current technology. D. Luong et al. [Applied Physics B 122, 96 (2016)] proposed a protocol to beat a repeaterless bound using one pair of quantum memories. However, the required experimental parameters for the memories are quite demanding. We extend the protocol with multiple pairs of memories, operated in a parallel manner to relax these conditions. We quantify the amount of relaxat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we have developed a large scale numerical Monte Carlo simulation for quantum repeaters that can faithfully represent loss and imperfect quantum memories, as well as other sources of noise such as dark counts. While there are existing approaches dealing with the computation of key rates for different repeater setups [4,25,26,32], the generalization of these methods to longer distances and other error models is by no means straightforward, e.g. an analytical approach also involves an intricate analysis of entanglement swapping strategies [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To this end, we have developed a large scale numerical Monte Carlo simulation for quantum repeaters that can faithfully represent loss and imperfect quantum memories, as well as other sources of noise such as dark counts. While there are existing approaches dealing with the computation of key rates for different repeater setups [4,25,26,32], the generalization of these methods to longer distances and other error models is by no means straightforward, e.g. an analytical approach also involves an intricate analysis of entanglement swapping strategies [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference from protocols in Refs. [25,26] is that the satellites with entangled pair sources do not have the information about whether a qubit has been loaded into memory successfully. Therefore, it makes sense for the source not to wait until confirmation from the satellite with the memory but to instead continuously send out entangled pairs.…”
Section: A Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…no QM (grey dashed) 42 ; (ii) uplink configuration with protocol presented in ref. 31,32 (blue) and finally (iii) downlink scenario with a single memory pair (m = 1, red) and 100 memory pairs (m = 100, green) 43 . Parameters used in simulations to generate Figs.…”
Section: Quantum Repeatersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also requires long-lived QMs with storage times in the order of seconds to achieve similar performance to the previous method. An extension of this protocol in which the central pair of QMs are replaced with m pairs of QMs 43 reduces the required storage time.…”
Section: Quantum Repeatersmentioning
confidence: 99%