2010
DOI: 10.1002/eco.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beaver dams, hydrological thresholds, and controlled floods as a management tool in a desert riverine ecosystem, Bill Williams River, Arizona

Abstract: Beaver convert lotic stream habitat to lentic through dam construction, and the process is reversed when a flood or other event causes dam failure. We investigated both processes on a regulated Sonoran Desert stream, using the criterion that average current velocity is <0Ð2 m s 1 in a lentic reach. We estimated temporal change in the lotic : lentic stream length ratio by relating beaver pond length (determined by the upstream lentic-lotic boundary position) to dam size, and coupling that to the dam-size freque… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that, as with the site studied, where closely‐spaced, multi‐dam complexes exist, these will provide a major buffering effect, reducing the likelihood of dam failure and, in so doing, also reducing the downstream release of sediment from any single dam failure. It is clear from the literature that significant uncertainty regarding dam failure dynamics exists (Anderson and Shaforth, 2010; Klimenko and Eponchintseva, 2015) and is an area in need of further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that, as with the site studied, where closely‐spaced, multi‐dam complexes exist, these will provide a major buffering effect, reducing the likelihood of dam failure and, in so doing, also reducing the downstream release of sediment from any single dam failure. It is clear from the literature that significant uncertainty regarding dam failure dynamics exists (Anderson and Shaforth, 2010; Klimenko and Eponchintseva, 2015) and is an area in need of further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River stage at the RR staff gage rose 1.05 m in response to the 2008 flood pulse ( Fig. 3; see also Andersen and Shafroth 2010). Based on similarities in channel geometry, the rise was probably also~1 m immediately downstream at dams PC-I, -H, -G and -F, and perhaps -E. Below Dam PC-E, secondary channels became available, and stage rise would have been lower.…”
Section: Hydrologymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Cross-sections spanned both lentic (beaver pond) and lotic habitat at PR (n=4) and PC (n=13), but only lotic habitat at RR (n=3). A cross-section above a beaver dam was classified as being in the associated beaver pond if mean pre-flood (base flow) current velocity at that position was ≤0.2 m/s, the criterion adopted by Andersen and Shafroth (2010) to differentiate lentic from lotic reaches. We further differentiated in-pond cross-sections into those ≤20 m above the dam (Lower Pond) and those farther upstream (Upper Pond).…”
Section: Geomorphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beaver-dam construction results in the accumulation and sorting of sediment in the upstream-ponded area, as the structure alters both the hydraulics and geometry of the channel, greatly reducing velocities and increasing the surface area (Butler, 1995;Pollock et al, 2004;Green and Westbrook, 2009;Andersen and Shafroth, 2010). Vertical aggradation rates between o0.01 m yr À1 and 0.40 m yr À1 have been reported, depending on the sediment load, hydrology, channel slope, and dam age (Butler and Malanson, 2005;Meentenmeyer and Butler, 1999;Pollock et al, 2007).…”
Section: Beavers and Channel Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is then reversed with the failure of beaver dams (Andersen and Shafroth, 2010). This process is then reversed with the failure of beaver dams (Andersen and Shafroth, 2010).…”
Section: Beavers and Channel Slopementioning
confidence: 99%