2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3940362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Before-and-After Field Investigation of the Effects on Pollutant Emissions of Replacing a Signal-Controlled Road Intersection with a Roundabout

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to assess the effects on air pollution that may derive from replacing a signal-controlled intersection with a roundabout, using a before-and-after approach. Based on field data collected with a test car instrumented with a Portable Emission Measurement System, the two intersection configurations were compared in terms of emissions of CO 2 , CO, and NO . The existence of significant differences in emissions between the two types of control was assessed by means of a statistical tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The VERSIT + Enviver emission model [63] shows that small roundabouts reduce NO x by 21% [60]. On the contrary, the studies by [64,65] point out that that vehicles at turbo-roundabouts generated more NO x (12%-19%) than vehicles at the conventional multi-lane roundabouts (depending on the car flow) and 33% more NO x than signalised intersections [59,66]. As can be seen, there is no consensus about the benefits of turbo-roundabouts regarding the available capacity of the intersection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VERSIT + Enviver emission model [63] shows that small roundabouts reduce NO x by 21% [60]. On the contrary, the studies by [64,65] point out that that vehicles at turbo-roundabouts generated more NO x (12%-19%) than vehicles at the conventional multi-lane roundabouts (depending on the car flow) and 33% more NO x than signalised intersections [59,66]. As can be seen, there is no consensus about the benefits of turbo-roundabouts regarding the available capacity of the intersection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalam proses kewujudan pencemaran udara trafik di Kuala Lumpur mendapati sebanyak 99.5 peratus penduduk menyatakan bahawa pelepasan bahan pencemar dilepaskan dalam kuantiti yang tinggi daripada ekzos kenderaan di jalan raya bandar (87%) (Jadual 4). Penyampaian jawapan oleh penduduk mengenai lokasi utama pengeluaran bahan pencemar yang tinggi adalah di lebuh raya bandar adalah kurang tepat kerana berdasarkan beberapa kajian terdahulu membuktikan bahawa persimpangan lampu isyarat merupakan tempat yang menyumbang pelepasan bahan pencemar yang tinggi (Kho & Law, 2014;Bing & Zhang, 2016;Kyung-Hwan et al, 2018;Shehadeh, 2018;Meneguzzer et al, 2018;Etim, 2016;Budihardjo et al, 2018;Longinus & John, 2016). Hal ini menunjukkan bahawa penduduk di Kuala Lumpur pengetahuan penduduk berada pada tahap sederhana melalui beberapa persepsi yang diberikan adalah kurang tepat.…”
Section: Metod Kajianunclassified
“…In the last two decades, roundabouts have become the most common and efficient solution for at-grade intersections [1][2][3][4][5]. However, many papers have evinced that standard multi-lane roundabouts offer lower capacity compared to estimates and a high rate of crashes [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%