2008
DOI: 10.1029/2008gl036120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of current sheets at directional magnetic discontinuities in the solar wind at 0.72 AU

Abstract: Venus Express interplanetary magnetic field measurements have been examined for magnetic “holes,” accompanied by magnetic field directional changes. We examine both the thickness of the current sheet and the depth of the magnetic field depression. We find the thickness of the current sheet is not correlated with the depth of the field depression. The depth of the magnetic holes is related to directional angle change. Since total pressure should balance across these discontinuities, there must be enhanced plasm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of magnetic holes in space plasmas has been known for many years. Examples in the solar wind were first reported by Turner et al [1977], and subsequent studies have shown that these cover a range of scale sizes, with the observed depressions sometimes as short as 5 s, or in other events lasting for hours or more [e.g., Turner et al, 1977;Tsurutani et al, 1992;Winterhalter et al, 1994;Zurbuchen et al, 2001;Zhang et al, 2008;Xiao et al, 2010]. Similar structures have also been observed in other space environments, such as the magnetosheaths of Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn [e.g., Kaufmann et al, 1970;Tsurutani et al, 1982;Erdős and Balogh, 1996;Chisham et al, 1999].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The existence of magnetic holes in space plasmas has been known for many years. Examples in the solar wind were first reported by Turner et al [1977], and subsequent studies have shown that these cover a range of scale sizes, with the observed depressions sometimes as short as 5 s, or in other events lasting for hours or more [e.g., Turner et al, 1977;Tsurutani et al, 1992;Winterhalter et al, 1994;Zurbuchen et al, 2001;Zhang et al, 2008;Xiao et al, 2010]. Similar structures have also been observed in other space environments, such as the magnetosheaths of Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn [e.g., Kaufmann et al, 1970;Tsurutani et al, 1982;Erdős and Balogh, 1996;Chisham et al, 1999].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The occurrence rate remains constant within 1 AU but decreases beyond 2 AU with increasing heliocentric distance, with no clear radial dependence observed between 1 and 2 AU. Zhang, Russell, Zambelli, et al (2008) examined solar wind data from the Venus Express spacecraft for MHs identified as the minimum field strength within a 300 s rolling window with at least 50% decrease below the background field and found that at 0.72 AU, the duration of rotational holes associated with a reconnection current sheet is generally less than 30 s, and their thickness is about 2,000 km, comparable to observations at 1 AU. Other studies at 1 AU have reported ∼39% of all MHs are of linear type (Briand et al, 2010;Stevens & Kasper, 2007), while over the solar poles, nearly half of the magnetic depressions are linear MHs (Fränz et al, 2000;Tsurutani et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Finding #3 in Table points out that the profiles of solar wind current sheets determine the high‐frequency magnetic spectra. As noted in Table , physical concepts that are important to the spatial profiles of current sheets are current sheet structuring (Gekelman et al, ; Ng et al, ; Schindler & Birn, ; Schindler & Hesse, ), plasma expansion and compression (Schindler & Hesse, , ), Bohm and gyro‐Bohm diffusion (Borovsky & Gary, ; Pecseli & Mikkelsen, ; Vahala & Montgomery, ), finite‐gyroradii effects (Schindler & Hesse, ), ion versus electron current carriers (Aunai et al, ; Sasunov et al, ; Schindler & Birn, ), Alfvén wave nonlinear processes (Gomberoff, ; Tsurutani et al, ), plasma waves in current sheets (Huang et al, ; Malaspina et al, ; Verscharen & Marsch, ; Zelenyi et al, ), pressure balance (Riazantseva et al, ; Tu et al, ; Zhang et al, ), and three‐dimensional reconnection (Huang & Bhattacharjee, ; Wyper & Hesse, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%