2016
DOI: 10.12989/cac.2016.18.3.389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of reinforced concrete plates under impact loading: different support conditions and sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to maintain consistent input energy during impact loading, a 40 kg hammer was systematically released from a height of 450 mm in a succession of trials carried out within the scope of the study. Numerous measurements of acceleration, displacement, and strain were meticulously recorded to assess both the efcacy of the reinforcement procedure and the response of the slabs to impact [74,[92][93][94][95][96].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to maintain consistent input energy during impact loading, a 40 kg hammer was systematically released from a height of 450 mm in a succession of trials carried out within the scope of the study. Numerous measurements of acceleration, displacement, and strain were meticulously recorded to assess both the efcacy of the reinforcement procedure and the response of the slabs to impact [74,[92][93][94][95][96].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stiffness degradation parameters for both compression and tension were also defined by the mechanical properties of the CDP model. In addition, the material properties which were used in the CDP model are summarized in Table 2 [32]. For the simulation of the soil and compacted gravel layers, the most common material model is Drucker Prager Hardening model [33].…”
Section: Fe Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are very successful against many dynamic load types (earthquake, tsunami, blasting, etc.) apart from their main usage purposes [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%