2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral avoidance of contagion in childhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our age range was generally in line with similar storybook learning and contagion knowledge research, we did not have a large-enough sample size to explore age-related differences. However, previous research has reported that knowledge, and not age, is the best predictor of children's illness avoidance behavior; indeed, even the youngest children in Blacker and LoBue's (2016) sample avoided a sick confederate if they had causal knowledge about illness transmission (Blacker and LoBue, 2016). However, further exploring the developmental trajectory across early childhood is an important goal for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While our age range was generally in line with similar storybook learning and contagion knowledge research, we did not have a large-enough sample size to explore age-related differences. However, previous research has reported that knowledge, and not age, is the best predictor of children's illness avoidance behavior; indeed, even the youngest children in Blacker and LoBue's (2016) sample avoided a sick confederate if they had causal knowledge about illness transmission (Blacker and LoBue, 2016). However, further exploring the developmental trajectory across early childhood is an important goal for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the best predictor of children's avoidance behavior was not age but, instead, was their ability to make predictions about illness outcomes. In other words, even 4-and 5-year-olds avoided contact with the sick confederate if they had causal knowledge about illness transmission (Blacker and LoBue, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, preschoolers demonstrate evidence of naïve biological theories that highlight differences between living and nonliving things ( Hatano & Inagaki, 2013 ) and have some understanding that illness is a biological process that is related the presence of germs ( Kalish, 1996 , Solomon and Cassimatis, 1999 ) and unfolds over time ( Raman & Gelman, 2007 ). Children use cues of illness when making social decisions; by 5 years of age, children report social preferences for people who are physically clean rather than dirty ( Rottman et al, 2020 ) and avoid playing with a person who appears to be sick ( Blacker & LoBue, 2016 ). Indeed, children’s understanding of germs predicts their ability to avoid someone who might be sick ( Blacker & LoBue, 2016 ), suggesting that children who demonstrate knowledge about contamination may have more effective behavioral avoidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children use cues of illness when making social decisions; by 5 years of age, children report social preferences for people who are physically clean rather than dirty ( Rottman et al, 2020 ) and avoid playing with a person who appears to be sick ( Blacker & LoBue, 2016 ). Indeed, children’s understanding of germs predicts their ability to avoid someone who might be sick ( Blacker & LoBue, 2016 ), suggesting that children who demonstrate knowledge about contamination may have more effective behavioral avoidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%