1991
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Ecology of Pheromone-Mediated Communication in Moths and Its Importance in the Use of Pheromone Traps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
80
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
6
80
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The physiological costs of pheromone production are only beginning to become clear (Harari et al 2011;Harari and Steinitz 2013). Even less attention has been paid to the spatial distribution of females (McNeil 1991), how developmental environment affects calling, and how calling neighbors affect a female's calling behavior (Stelinski et al 2006). It is also unclear as to the relative transition between effects of long-range and short-range mate searching, because once males locate females, shortrange pheromones and acoustic cues may influence whether mating occurs (Birch et al 1990;Conner 1999).…”
Section: A Theoretical Approach To Adaptive Variation In Female Pheromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The physiological costs of pheromone production are only beginning to become clear (Harari et al 2011;Harari and Steinitz 2013). Even less attention has been paid to the spatial distribution of females (McNeil 1991), how developmental environment affects calling, and how calling neighbors affect a female's calling behavior (Stelinski et al 2006). It is also unclear as to the relative transition between effects of long-range and short-range mate searching, because once males locate females, shortrange pheromones and acoustic cues may influence whether mating occurs (Birch et al 1990;Conner 1999).…”
Section: A Theoretical Approach To Adaptive Variation In Female Pheromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also unclear as to the relative transition between effects of long-range and short-range mate searching, because once males locate females, shortrange pheromones and acoustic cues may influence whether mating occurs (Birch et al 1990;Conner 1999). Further, obviously all of these factors can be strongly influenced by the weather and climate (McNeil 1991;Pellegrino et al 2013), and mate-searching males are known to navigate pheromone plumes of rather complex filamentous structure (e.g., Liu and Haynes 1992). Females can simply modify male arrival rates by choosing not to call (e.g., after mating; Webster and Cardé 1984).…”
Section: A Theoretical Approach To Adaptive Variation In Female Pheromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diferenças na periodicidade de acasalamentos dos Lepidoptera em razão da idade podem ser explicadas por mudanças nos padrões temporais da síntese e liberação do feromônio sexual pelas fêmeas, assim como da resposta dos machos, em razão do estado fisiológico do inseto (McNeil 1991, McNeil et al 1996. Portanto, as maiores freqüências de acasalamento de L. coffeella nas idades de um e três dias estariam relacionadas com elevadas taxas de produção e liberação de feromônio sexual e com a maior receptividade e resposta dos machos aos estímulos da fêmea.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A captura nas armadilhas com fêmeas virgens, reflete pelo menos em parte, a atividade de chamamento destas (McNeil 1991). Nestas armadilhas, a captura dos machos foi máxima ao meio-dia (6h da fotofase), possivelmente devido ao maior número de fêmeas em chamamento.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Estas variações tanto podem ser explicadas pela variabilidade genética, possivelmente por causa do isolamento geográfico das populações, bem como pelos fatores que afetam a resposta dos machos, tais como temperatura e umidade, planta hospedeira, idade das fêmeas e status reprodutivo (McNeil, 1991). Variações similares nas respostas dos machos entre populações isoladas geograficamente, ocorrem em outros lepidópteros e em alguns coleópteros (Cardé et al, 1978).…”
Section: Fig 1 Número Médio (± Erro-padrão) De Machos Deunclassified