2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2008.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral economics and climate change policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
120
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, firm behavioural theory was presented by Cryert and March (1963) which stated that organizations are adoptive systems, learning from both internal and external changes and demands, adjusting itself between external shocks and internal operating procedure, but more focusing on internal autonomy instead of external driving factors (Gavetti, Greve, Levinthal, & Ocasio, 2012;Duckjung Shin, 2014;Argote & M.Guo, 2016;Fang, Kim, & Milliken, 2014). Adaptation Theory further enlarged the dilemma and even developed a tension between economists and behaviourists because economists were focusing on rational based long-term benefits and organizational adjustment according to the wave of external situations and behaviourists were strict to follow organizational procedure, welcoming internal ideas and innovations following limited rational policy (Gowdy, 2008;Dosi & Marengo, 2007). Limited rational policy created four types ambiguities in organizational learning cycle.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, firm behavioural theory was presented by Cryert and March (1963) which stated that organizations are adoptive systems, learning from both internal and external changes and demands, adjusting itself between external shocks and internal operating procedure, but more focusing on internal autonomy instead of external driving factors (Gavetti, Greve, Levinthal, & Ocasio, 2012;Duckjung Shin, 2014;Argote & M.Guo, 2016;Fang, Kim, & Milliken, 2014). Adaptation Theory further enlarged the dilemma and even developed a tension between economists and behaviourists because economists were focusing on rational based long-term benefits and organizational adjustment according to the wave of external situations and behaviourists were strict to follow organizational procedure, welcoming internal ideas and innovations following limited rational policy (Gowdy, 2008;Dosi & Marengo, 2007). Limited rational policy created four types ambiguities in organizational learning cycle.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can have adverse effects. Several environmental scientists have proven (Gowdy, 2008;Norton, 2005;O'neill, 1993) when giving individuals shared accountability that are directly attractive to the sense of the common good, these could be more effective ways to gain acceptance to alleviate climate change and other environmental strategies.…”
Section: Acceptance Of Behavioural Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral economics is particularly useful as an alternative basis for climate policy analysis, as it offers distinct views on decision-making under risk and uncertainty and in intertemporal settings. Few studies have so far addressed this issue (Gowdy 2008;Brekke and Johansson-Stenman 2008). We have summarized evidence here which indicates that climate policy as proposed might not work as efficiently and effectively as intended due to bounded rationality and other-regarding preferences.…”
Section: Implications For Climate Policymentioning
confidence: 99%