2017
DOI: 10.1159/000470899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Performance and Neural Systems Are Robust to Sensory Injury in Workers of the Ant Pheidole dentata

Abstract: Miniaturized nervous systems have been thought to limit behavioral ability, and animals with miniaturized brains may be less flexible when challenged by injuries resulting in sensory deficits that impact the development, maintenance, and plasticity of small-scale neural networks. We experimentally examined how injuries to sensory structures critical for olfactory ability affect behavioral performance in workers of the ant Pheidole dentata, which have minute brains (0.01 mm3) and primarily rely on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7B). This is consistent with evidence from drosophila that show adaptation within days after amputation (Wosnitza, 2013;Isakov, 2016;Muijres, 2017), as well as recent studies on ants showing robust performance across a range of olfactory behaviors after unilateral antenna amputation (Waxman, 2017). This resulting behavioral change in antennae movement may partially explain how the single antenna ant is able to maintain a level of estimated odor information similar to what one antenna of a control ant receives despite greater deviation from the trail (Fig.…”
Section: Single Antenna Removal Mildly Impairs Tracking and Results Isupporting
confidence: 90%
“…7B). This is consistent with evidence from drosophila that show adaptation within days after amputation (Wosnitza, 2013;Isakov, 2016;Muijres, 2017), as well as recent studies on ants showing robust performance across a range of olfactory behaviors after unilateral antenna amputation (Waxman, 2017). This resulting behavioral change in antennae movement may partially explain how the single antenna ant is able to maintain a level of estimated odor information similar to what one antenna of a control ant receives despite greater deviation from the trail (Fig.…”
Section: Single Antenna Removal Mildly Impairs Tracking and Results Isupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Yet, in this same species, the peripheral nervous system is not associated with worker differences in responsiveness to alarm pheromone (Robinson, 1987). Though we do find variation in T. rugatulus sensory organs, our results are consistent with those of (Waxman et al, 2017), which suggest that sensory organ differences may not have significant effects on behavior and task allocation. Rather than variation in density, variation in the size of individual sensilla or differences across individual sensilla in the number of underlying sensory neurons might affect sensory sensitivity and therefore behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Recent work in Pheidole ants, for example, demonstrates that unilateral antennal ablation (i.e. resulting in the loss of roughly half of their sensilla) does not prevent workers from carrying out most of their normal task repertoire (Waxman et al, 2017). In contrast, antennal removal has significant effects on behavior in Tetragonula bees (though this was not associated with sensilla number), and in honeybees the right antenna is both more enriched with olfactory sensilla and better at recalling olfactory memories than the left.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure receives input of the antennal and optic lobes in most hymenopteran species [Gronenberg, 2001]. Part of the reduction in relative calyx volume in smaller individuals may thus have resulted from a reduced input from the smaller optic lobe, although ants did not show a decrease in mushroom body volume after a decrease in the primary sensory neuropils [Waxman et al, 2017]. Vision-or olfaction-specific calyx subunits that are visible in honeybees (i.e., lip and collar) are, however, not distinguishable in N. vitripennis.…”
Section: Groothuis/smidmentioning
confidence: 99%