2007
DOI: 10.3201/eid1303.060941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Risks for West Nile Virus Disease, Northern Colorado, 2003

Abstract: Protective practices may affect the level of illness in a community.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are 1) the density of infected mosquitoes, resulting from the product of mosquito abundance and the estimated infection prevalence; 19,47 2) the probability that a mosquito species will infect a mammal, 48 which is calculated as the product of abundance, proportion of blood meals taken from mammals, the estimated infection rate, and the fraction of infected mosquitoes that will subsequently transmit virus by bite; and 3) the vector index, which considers multiple species and is calculated as the summation of the product of the average number of mosquitoes of each species per trap times the proportion of infected mosquitoes of each species. 49 Although these indicators of risk need more parameters and consequently need to meet more assumptions, they might be better than infection rates alone given that they consider more complexities of the systems under surveillance. The calculation of the parameters for these risk estimates for different species and for different geographic areas is necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are 1) the density of infected mosquitoes, resulting from the product of mosquito abundance and the estimated infection prevalence; 19,47 2) the probability that a mosquito species will infect a mammal, 48 which is calculated as the product of abundance, proportion of blood meals taken from mammals, the estimated infection rate, and the fraction of infected mosquitoes that will subsequently transmit virus by bite; and 3) the vector index, which considers multiple species and is calculated as the summation of the product of the average number of mosquitoes of each species per trap times the proportion of infected mosquitoes of each species. 49 Although these indicators of risk need more parameters and consequently need to meet more assumptions, they might be better than infection rates alone given that they consider more complexities of the systems under surveillance. The calculation of the parameters for these risk estimates for different species and for different geographic areas is necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether model outcomes realistically represent enzootic transmission at the sites, we validated the model using a field-derived monthly mean Vector Index (VI) [38]. The VI is an estimate of the mean number of WNV-infected Cx.…”
Section: (D) Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, resting collections capture adult mosquitoes from a broad range of physiological states (i.e., host-seeking, blood-engorged, gravid, postovipositional) and thus are not useful for calculating vector indices, which are derived from collections of hostseeking female mosquitoes only (Gujral et al 2007). Second, resting traps predominantly attract mosquito vectors in the genera Culex, Culiseta, and Anopheles (Goodwin 1942, Meyer 1985, Komar et al 1995, Burkett-Cadena etal.…”
Section: Resting Mosquitoes; Culex Pipiens; Culex Tarsalis; Resting Trapmentioning
confidence: 99%