2015
DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-2015-8-11-2561-2571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being an Ethical Speaker Online: Correspondence with Foreign Partners

Abstract: Analysis of the rules of language behavior in social network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of spoken vocabulary, and slang in particular, is seen as a reflection of distance convergence between communicators (Kornilova, Vasilieva 2015;Ermakova 2000). In some communities, the lack of novelty in messages is regarded as a violation of speech etiquette (Osetrova 2015).…”
Section: Definition Of Se In Online Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of spoken vocabulary, and slang in particular, is seen as a reflection of distance convergence between communicators (Kornilova, Vasilieva 2015;Ermakova 2000). In some communities, the lack of novelty in messages is regarded as a violation of speech etiquette (Osetrova 2015).…”
Section: Definition Of Se In Online Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, sociologists argue that the rules "regulating the communication of community members through the mechanisms of cultural diffusion become almost the same for many typical groups" (Sergodeev,8). The linguistic analysis which allows introducing the participants' speech behavior peculiarities into the sphere of visibility testifies to the differences in the rules (see, for example: Osetrova 2015). It becomes obvious that it is impossible to comprehend new forms of sociality in virtual reality when using only sociological analysis -the linguistic analysis of network communities' organization is necessary as it draws attention to the form of the participants' interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%