1996
DOI: 10.1080/0950069960180406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beliefs regarding force and motion: a longitudinal and cross‐cultural study of South African school pupils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the students' answers, it appears that the correct answer (in both cases above) is given by only 35.4%. At the same time, the well-known alternative idea prevails that force is only connected to the existence of movement (Driver, 1984;Galili & Bar, 1992;Enderstein & Spango, 1996;Bayraktar, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the students' answers, it appears that the correct answer (in both cases above) is given by only 35.4%. At the same time, the well-known alternative idea prevails that force is only connected to the existence of movement (Driver, 1984;Galili & Bar, 1992;Enderstein & Spango, 1996;Bayraktar, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this longitudinal and cross-cultural study carried out in schools in the Cape Province of the Republic of South Africa and the then Transkei, some of the results of which have already been reported (Enderstein and Spargo 1996), we used a multiple-choice questionnaire to investigate the beliefs pupils hold about a number of different physical events. The study involved 1834 pupils in schools in the Cape and 492 pupils in schools in Transkei, giving a total of 2326 pupils in all.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research over the past forty years at an international level (Brown, 1989;Clement, 1982;Viennot, 1979) conducted on secondary school students has shown that students still have serious misconceptions about physics concepts and phenomena. Indicatively, the research on the ideas, perceptions, and difficulties of pupils and students regarding the concepts of kinematics (Trowbridge & McDermott, 1980, 1981, dynamics (Clement, 1982;Enderstein & Spango, 1996;Galili & Bar, 1992;Palmer 1997), shots (Halloun & Hestenes, 1985a;Whitaker, 1983), energy (Goldring & Osborne 1994;Lawson & McDermott, 1987), momentum (Graham & Berry, 1996), electricity (Metioui et al, 1996;Shipstone et al, 1988), optics (Ambrose et al, 1999;Galili, 1996), thermodynamics (Johnstone et al, 1977;Kesidou & Duit, 1993), the structure of matter (Griffiths & Preston, 1992), and wave (Maurines, 1992). A valuable list of the international literature can be found in McDermott and Redish's (1999) paper.…”
Section: Alternative Ideas Of Secondary School and University Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%