Beliefs, Social Normative Influences, and Compliance with Antihypertensive Medication

Norman, Sandra A.; Marconi, Katherine; Schezel, George W.; Schechter, Carol F.; Stolley, Paul D.

doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(18)31407-7

Cited by 31 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…13 It is a self-report questionnaire with 8 questions (items). The questions were formulated to avoid a ''yes-saying'' bias, ie, the wording of the item 5 is reversed to prevent the tendency to respond in a specific way to a series of questions regardless of their content.…”

Section: -Item Mmasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a French Version of the 8‐Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Hypertensive Adults

Korb-Savoldelli

Gillaizeau

Pouchot

et al. 2012

J of Clinical Hypertension

127

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012; 14:429–434. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The aim of this study was to validate a French translation of the structured self‐report 8‐item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS‐8) and determine its psychometric properties in patients taking antihypertensive medication. An observational cross‐sectional study was conducted in the hypertensive unit of a French university hospital. The MMAS‐8 was translated according to international guidelines. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach α coefficient, construct validity using principal component and confirmatory factor analyses, and the test‐retest reliability at 1‐month interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three levels of adherence were considered (low: scores of 0 to <6; medium: 6 to <8; high: 8) and risk factors were explored in ordinal logistic regression models. A total of 199 patients were included: mean age, 55.7±14.6 years, 57.3% men (114 of 199), and 39.5% (66 of 167) had uncontrolled blood pressure. The French MMAS was moderately reliable (α=0.54), one‐dimensional, and reproducible (ICC=0.68). The mean score was 6.96 (standard deviation 1.25) and 17.6% (35 of 199), 37.7% (75 of 199), and 43.7% (87 of 199) of patients had low, medium, and high adherence, respectively. The only factor significantly associated with adherence was age. The French MMAS has acceptable psychometric effects to measure medication adherence in hypertensive patients and may be useful in detecting nonadherent hypertensive patients.

show abstract

Section: -Item Mmasmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a French Version of the 8‐Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Hypertensive Adults

Korb-Savoldelli

Gillaizeau

Pouchot

et al. 2012

J of Clinical Hypertension

127

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A large proportion of retrieved studies suggested that they might have higher compliance (Norman et al 1985;Didlake et al 1988;Schweizer et al 1990;Shea et al 1992;Frazier et al 1994;McLane et al 1995;Shaw et al 1995;Monane et al 1996;Buck et al 1997;Viller et al 1999;Sirey et al 2001;Kim et al 2002;Senior et al 2004;Hertz et al 2005). In a study carried out in UK, patients over 60 years old were more likely to be always compliant with their antiepileptic tablets than patients under 60 years old (86% vs 66%, respectively) (Buck et al 1997).…”

Section: Agementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several studies found that patients with higher educational level might have higher compliance (Apter et al 1998;Okuno et al 2001;Ghods and Nasrollahzadeh 2003;Yavuz et al 2004), while some studies found no association (Norman et al 1985;Horne and Weinman 1999;Spikmans et al 2003;Kaona et al 2004;Stilley et al 2004;Wai et al 2005). Intuitively, it may be expected that patients with higher educational level should have better knowledge about the disease and therapy and therefore be more compliant.…”

Section: Educational Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Counseling about medications is very useful in improving patient's compliance (Ponnusankar et al 2004). Healthcare providers should give patients enough education about the treatment and disease (Haynes et al 1980;Norman et al 1985;Stanton 1987;Olubodun et al 1990;Lorenc and Branthwaite 1993;Menzies et al 1993;Milas et al 1995;Chizzola et al 1996;Hungin 1999;Liam et al 1999;Okuno et al 1999;Viller et al 1999;Lindberg et al 2001;Thomas et al 2001;Gascon et al 2004;Iihara et al 2004;Kaona et al 2004;Ponnusankar et al 2004;Seo and Min 2005).…”

Section: Patient Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient’s perspective

Jin

Sklar²,

Oh³

et al. 2008

TCRM

865

248

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To explore and evaluate the most common factors causing therapeutic noncompliance. Methods: A qualitative review was undertaken by a literature search of the Medline database from 1970 to 2005 to identify studies evaluating the factors contributing to therapeutic non-compliance. Results: A total of 102 articles was retrieved and used in the review from the 2095 articles identifi ed by the literature review process. From the literature review, it would appear that the defi nition of therapeutic compliance is adequately resolved. The preliminary evaluation revealed a number of factors that contributed to therapeutic non-compliance. These factors could be categorized to patient-centered factors, therapy-related factors, social and economic factors, healthcare system factors, and disease factors. For some of these factors, the impact on compliance was not unequivocal, but for other factors, the impact was inconsistent and contradictory. Conclusion: There are numerous studies on therapeutic noncompliance over the years. The factors related to compliance may be better categorized as "soft" and "hard" factors as the approach in countering their effects may differ. The review also highlights that the interaction of the various factors has not been studied systematically. Future studies need to address this interaction issue, as this may be crucial to reducing the level of non-compliance in general, and to enhancing the possibility of achieving the desired healthcare outcomes.

show abstract

“…Both groups, for example, disagreed on presenting potential drug adverse effects, a recommendation not supported by the best evidence (38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43). The PEM improved on the basis of the evaluation by physicians and nurses should be sequentially evaluated by professionals of communication and by the patients themselves.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validity of a method for the evaluation of printed education material

Castro¹,

Pilger²,

Fuchs³

et al. 2007

Pharmacy pract. (Granada Ed. impr.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

*Objectives: To develop and study the validity of an instrument for evaluation of Printed Education Materials (PEM); to evaluate the use of acceptability indices; to identify possible influences of professional aspects. Methods: An instrument for PEM evaluation was developed which included tree steps: domain identification, item generation and instrument design. A reading to easy PEM was developed for education of patient with systemic hypertension and its treatment with hydrochlorothiazide. Construct validity was measured based on previously established errors purposively introduced into the PEM, which served as extreme groups. An acceptability index was applied taking into account the rate of professionals who should approve each item. Participants were 10 physicians (9 men) and 5 nurses (all women). Results: Many professionals identified intentional errors of crude character. Few participants identified errors that needed more careful evaluation, and no one detected the intentional error that required literature analysis. Physicians considered as acceptable 95.8% of the items of the PEM, and nurses 29.2%. The differences between the scoring were statistically significant in 27% of the items. In the overall evaluation, 66.6% were considered as acceptable. The analysis of each item revealed a behavioral pattern for each professional group. Conclusions: The use of instruments for evaluation of printed education materials is required and may improve the quality of the PEM available for the patients. Not always are the acceptability indices totally correct or represent high quality of information. The professional experience, the practice pattern, and perhaps the gendre of the reviewers may influence their evaluation. RESUMENObjetivos: Desarrollar y estudiar la validez de un instrumento para la evaluación del material educativo impreso (MEI); evaluar el uso de los índices de aceptabilidad; identificar las posibles influencias de los aspectos profesionales. Métodos: Se desarrolló un instrumento para evaluación del MEI en tres pasos: identificación de dominios, generación de ítems y diseño del instrumento. Se desarrolló un MEI fácil de leer para la educación de pacientes con hipertensión sistémica y su tratamiento con hidroclorotiazida. Se midió la validez del instrumento mediante los errores previamente introducidos a propósito en el MEI, lo que sirvió de grupo extremo. Se aplicó un índice de aceptabilidad teniendo en cuenta la tasa de profesionales que tenía que aprobar cada ítem. Participaron 10 médicos (9 hombres) y 5 enfermeras (todas mujeres). Resultados: Muchos profesionales identificaron los errores intencionales de carácter crudo. Pocos participantes identificaron los errores que necesitaban una evaluación más cuidadosa, y ninguno identificó el error intencional que requería análisis de la literatura. Los médicos consideraron aceptable el 95,8% de los ítems del MEI y las enfermeras el 29,2%. Las diferencias de puntuación fueron estadísticamente significativas en el 27% de los ítems. En la evaluaci...

show abstract

Beliefs, Social Normative Influences, and Compliance with Antihypertensive Medication

Cited by 31 publications

References 11 publications

Validation of a French Version of the 8‐Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Hypertensive Adults

Validation of a French Version of the 8‐Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Hypertensive Adults

Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient’s perspective

Development and validity of a method for the evaluation of printed education material

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Beliefs, Social Normative Influences, and Compliance with Antihypertensive Medication

Cited by 31 publications

References 11 publications

Validation of a French Version of the 8‐Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Hypertensive Adults

Validation of a French Version of the 8‐Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in Hypertensive Adults

Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient&rsquo;s perspective

Development and validity of a method for the evaluation of printed education material

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient’s perspective