2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2010.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Below-ground response of Norway spruce to climate conditions at Mt. Brocken (Germany)—A re-assessment of Central Europe's northernmost treeline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The four other stands were located within the protected area of Harz National Park and were natural spruce forests ranging in age from~100 years at lower elevation to~260 years at the treeline according to forest history archives (National Park Administration, pers. (Hertel and Schöling, 2011b). ; see also Firbas and Preuss, 1934;Firbas et al, 1939).…”
Section: Stand Structurementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The four other stands were located within the protected area of Harz National Park and were natural spruce forests ranging in age from~100 years at lower elevation to~260 years at the treeline according to forest history archives (National Park Administration, pers. (Hertel and Schöling, 2011b). ; see also Firbas and Preuss, 1934;Firbas et al, 1939).…”
Section: Stand Structurementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Six of the squares were randomly selected and analyzed under the stereomicroscope for even the smallest dead fine root fragments. The total mass of small dead rootlets was extrapolated by regression analysis from the ratio of small rootlets to large dead roots (>10 mm in length) recorded in the same subsample (Praag et al, 1988;Hertel and Sch€ oling, 2011). Sorted samples were dried at 70 C for 48 h and weighed.…”
Section: Fine Root Sampling and Morphological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mountains, tree height generally decreases with increasing elevation (e.g., Wilson et al, 1987; Young, 1993; Kessler et al, 2007), but, especially near the upper (alpine) treeline, a wide range of tree height-elevation relationships can be found (Holtmeier, 2009; Körner, 2012). Some studies have documented linear decreases with elevation (e.g., Paulsen et al, 2000; Kessler et al, 2007), while others have found increasingly steep declines in tree height close to treeline elevation (e.g., Barrera et al, 2000; Hertel and Wesche, 2008; Hertel and Schöling, 2011b) or even abrupt treelines (e.g., Miehe et al, 2007). Furthermore, treelines may be formed by closed stands of trees or by increasingly scattered tree individuals (Miehe et al, 2007; for a review of treeline physiognomy see Holtmeier, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%