2016
DOI: 10.1890/15-0551.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belowground competition among invading detritivores

Abstract: . The factors regulating soil animal communities are poorly understood. Current theory favors niche complementarity and facilitation over competition as the primary forms of non-trophic interspecifi c interaction in soil fauna; however, competition has frequently been suggested as an important community-structuring factor in earthworms, ecosystem engineers that infl uence belowground processes. To date, direct evidence of competition in earthworms is lacking due to the diffi culty inherent in identifying a lim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(125 reference statements)
1
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Xia et al, 2011;Crumsey et al, 2013), is consistent with the theoretical responses of soil microbes following a C pulse event, and can be readily explained by the enzyme-driven theoretical models of microbial C and N limitation (Schimel and Weintraub, 2003;Waring et al, 2013). Earthworms are also known to change the fate of litterderived C through a combination of their feeding, burrowing, and casting behaviors (Fahey et al, 2013a;Chang et al, 2016). Therefore, the contribution of litter-derived C to soil respiration may still be altered even under situations where total soil respiration is not affected.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Xia et al, 2011;Crumsey et al, 2013), is consistent with the theoretical responses of soil microbes following a C pulse event, and can be readily explained by the enzyme-driven theoretical models of microbial C and N limitation (Schimel and Weintraub, 2003;Waring et al, 2013). Earthworms are also known to change the fate of litterderived C through a combination of their feeding, burrowing, and casting behaviors (Fahey et al, 2013a;Chang et al, 2016). Therefore, the contribution of litter-derived C to soil respiration may still be altered even under situations where total soil respiration is not affected.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Increasing human population on the region leads to increased N-deposition and new species introduction. As an example, in one of our old forest stands, Treefall, several Asian earthworm species are currently invading from the neighboring residential areas (Chang et al, 2016). These future influences will cause trajectories of forest soils to diverge further away from the pre-Colonial states even affecting those forests that have not been cut or managed previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown to be the superior competitor when interacting with Lumbricus rubellus, an epi-endogeic European earthworm common in the US, for leaf litter. It does not appear to affect Eisenoides lonnbergi, a large native lumbricid common in riparian areas, wetlands, and some upland habitats in the eastern US (Chang et al 2016a). 16.…”
Section: Amynthas Tokioensismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One species, A. agrestis, has been shown to compete with native millipedes for food resources, and may reduce species richness and diversity in the latter (Snyder et al 2011(Snyder et al , 2013. Moreover, many of the forests invaded by Amynthas and Metaphire have native earthworm fauna and/or have already gone through significant changes due to invasion by European lumbricid earthworms, primarily of the genera Lumbricus, Aporrectodea, and Octolasion (Chang et al 2016a). The impacts of Asian earthworms will depend on how Amynthas and Metaphire interact with resident native and non-native species, and whether earthworm communities dominated by Asian earthworms function differently from those primarily composed of European species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation