2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belowground responses by AM fungi and animal trophic groups to repeated defoliation in an experimental grassland community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, H. lanatus and P. lanceolata plants decreased soil microbial biomass, L. corniculatus and P. lanceolata plants decreased the numbers of fungal-feeding Aphelenchoides and each of the live plant species decreased the abundance of omnivorous nematodes and the abundance of bacterial-feeding Acrobeloides and Eucephalobus. Such negative effects of live plants on decomposer growth have also been reported earlier Guitian and Bardgett 2000;Mikola et al 2005), and the explanation is likely to relate to soil fertility. Innes et al (2004) investigated the effect of six plant species (including grasses, herbs and one legume) on soil bacterial and fungal biomass and found that the effects were on average positive in an improved fertile soil, but on average negative in unimproved low fertility soil.…”
Section: Litter Effects On Decomposers and Plant N Uptakesupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, H. lanatus and P. lanceolata plants decreased soil microbial biomass, L. corniculatus and P. lanceolata plants decreased the numbers of fungal-feeding Aphelenchoides and each of the live plant species decreased the abundance of omnivorous nematodes and the abundance of bacterial-feeding Acrobeloides and Eucephalobus. Such negative effects of live plants on decomposer growth have also been reported earlier Guitian and Bardgett 2000;Mikola et al 2005), and the explanation is likely to relate to soil fertility. Innes et al (2004) investigated the effect of six plant species (including grasses, herbs and one legume) on soil bacterial and fungal biomass and found that the effects were on average positive in an improved fertile soil, but on average negative in unimproved low fertility soil.…”
Section: Litter Effects On Decomposers and Plant N Uptakesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The reason for this is that these organisms are abundant in the rhizosphere and thus are directly affected by plant roots (Clarholm 1985;Griffiths 1994). They also have high turnover rates and can respond to changes in resource availability within a few days (Bazot et al 2005;Mikola et al 2005;Saj et al 2008), which allows examination of plant-soil feedbacks in a short temporal scale (Hamilton and Frank 2001). It is, however, possible that the effects of changes in micro-food web structure on litter-N availability were outweighed by the effects of changes in the abundance of bigger organisms, such as enchytraeids and microarthropods, although populations of these animals should be less able to respond to changes in resource availability in the time scale of our study.…”
Section: Litter Effects On Decomposers and Plant N Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nematodes and enchytraeids are highly representative of the soil animal community, since they comprise all soil animal trophic groups, i.e., herbivores, bacterivores, fungivores, omnivores, detritivores and predators (Mikola et al 2005). In the current study, nematodes and enchytraeids were not aVected by the UV treatments, nor were there diVerences in their numbers between the tree species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nematodes were counted live and later, using preserved samples, up to 150 nematodes per sample were identified to genus and allocated into trophic groups according to Yeates et al (1993). Nematode data were analyzed both at the trophic group and genus level since different genera of a trophic group may not always respond to defoliation in parallel ways (Mikola et al 2005). For the analyses at the genus level, 11 most numerous genera, representing 91% of all identified individuals, were selected.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%