2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark exercise on image-based permeability determination of engineering textiles: Microscale predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interest in image-based permeability prediction has increased in recent years, as demonstrated by a new benchmark exercise, which also aims to develop guidelines for numerical permeability prediction. In fact, despite this method having many advantages, such as the possibility to consider the material variability and small-scale parameters, study multiple influencing factors, and reduce the material waste, some challenging issues include the need for elevated computing power, the potential errors related to image acquisition and geometry reconstruction, the presence of several numerical methods and influencing parameters, and the multi-scale porosity of fiber reinforcements [ 112 ].…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in image-based permeability prediction has increased in recent years, as demonstrated by a new benchmark exercise, which also aims to develop guidelines for numerical permeability prediction. In fact, despite this method having many advantages, such as the possibility to consider the material variability and small-scale parameters, study multiple influencing factors, and reduce the material waste, some challenging issues include the need for elevated computing power, the potential errors related to image acquisition and geometry reconstruction, the presence of several numerical methods and influencing parameters, and the multi-scale porosity of fiber reinforcements [ 112 ].…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, predictive permeability characterisation models are also an attractive area of research in order to overcome many of the tedious and temperamental aspects of the experimental approaches. In addition to the previously mentioned micro-and meso-scale modelling approaches for virtual permeability characterisation [16,17,18,32], there have also been efforts to develop iterative, macro-scale, simulation-enhanced methods for 3D permeability characterisation [49]. These are designed to support experimental procedures for greater accuracy and reliability overall, compared with conventional 3D methods that are based on the theoretical calculations for, and transformations from, an equivalent isotropic flow [50,51].…”
Section: Characterisation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the apparent simplicity of such a fluid dynamics model, the geometric complexity and stochastic nature of these materials makes accurate flow prediction particularly difficult. Micro-scale models, considering the flow between individual fibres in a preform, may simply rely on conventional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) packages to predict 2D or 3D flow, based on simple geometric approximations or real scans from X-ray micro-tomography [17]. As the simulation scale increases though, reasonable limits on the size and number of constitutive elements in the model necessitate significant degrees of homogenisation or geometric simplification.…”
Section: Vacuum Infusion Process Modelling 21 Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this, one can solve the momentum equations in terms of only the velocity field without considering additional degrees of freedom (DoFs) associated with the pressure. Despite the limitations and challenges associated with the choice of value for the penalty parameter itself, as discussed in [15], the reduction in the total number of degrees of freedom to solve is attractive for computationally costly problems such as the one in the virtual permeability benchmark [3] discussed further in Section 5.1. Thus, with the computational cost in mind, a modelling choice was made to use the penalty-based approach in this work.…”
Section: Modelling Of Single-phase Steady-state Porous Media Flow At ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different numerical methodologies for the solution of this problem with different discretisation techniques, physical variables formulation, boundary conditions, etc., exist in the literature. A recent benchmark on the image-based permeability determination of fibrous materials has illustrated this diversity of numerical approaches [ 3 ]. The most widely used numerical approximation methods are the Finite Volume Method (FVM) [ 4 ] and the Finite Element Method (FEM) [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%