2013
DOI: 10.1002/ctpp.201200074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark of Simplified Formulations for the Electrical Conductivity of Non‐Ideal Plasmas

Abstract: We discuss simplified formulations for the electrical conductivity [1] and compare them with experimental results of various expanded metals recently published [2]. We use formulations designed for fully ionized hydrogen in a broader range of non‐fully ionized materials of various atomic number through the use of an effective coupling parameter based on estimations of the ionization. The ionizations are deduced from average‐atom calculations and compared with faster Thomas‐Fermi‐Dirac estimations. (© 2013 WILE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5] These formulas use the theoretical formalisms of the ab initio approaches based on quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) simulations [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] or average-atom models. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Comparisons with experiment and QMD simulations were promising. Since they are analytical, these simple formulas can be used to study various asymptotic regimes, such as the non-degenerate and the degenerate situations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[2][3][4][5] These formulas use the theoretical formalisms of the ab initio approaches based on quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) simulations [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] or average-atom models. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Comparisons with experiment and QMD simulations were promising. Since they are analytical, these simple formulas can be used to study various asymptotic regimes, such as the non-degenerate and the degenerate situations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%