2000
DOI: 10.1172/jci9590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarks for antiretroviral therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our subanalysis exploring whether baseline viral load remains an important predictor of suppression later in follow‐up indicates that, after 18 months of therapy, baseline viral load is no longer significantly associated with suppression. This finding supports those of past studies in which it was concluded that time to suppression is a mathematical function corresponding to baseline viral load [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, our subanalysis exploring whether baseline viral load remains an important predictor of suppression later in follow‐up indicates that, after 18 months of therapy, baseline viral load is no longer significantly associated with suppression. This finding supports those of past studies in which it was concluded that time to suppression is a mathematical function corresponding to baseline viral load [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, our work demonstrates that baseline viral load is a more important predictor of time to virological suppression, which supports findings from past studies [28][29][30]. Furthermore, our subanalysis exploring whether baseline viral load remains an important predictor of suppression later in follow-up indicates that, after 18 months of therapy, baseline viral load is no longer significantly associated with suppression.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rapid shutdown of T cell activation by cyclosporin A in the early phase of HIV infection proved to be beneficial for both immunological and virological measures by preventing ongoing infection of new target cells in the lymphoid tissue [2,42]. Recent reports have shown that immune reconstitution in the intestinal lymphoid tissues did not take place after antiretroviral therapy in acute and early stage HIV infection [43,44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%