2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.06.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefit-cost Methodology for Highway-railway Grade Crossing Safety Protocols as Applied to Transportation Infrastructure Project Prioritization Processes

Abstract: This paper summarizes efforts in assisting the North Carolina Department of Transportation (Rail Division) in developing a methodology for identifying and prioritizing safety projects at highway-rail at-grade crossings (grade crossings). This approach leverages recent developments in data management to improve the identification, prioritization and selection of safety projects through the calculation of all the costs and benefits associated to a safety project. This approach will also provide policymakers with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Volmer et al (2006) applied benefit-cost ratio for project selection to improve the safety of grade crossings in Iowa. Similarly, Rezvani et al (2015) employed a benefit-cost approach to determine if a proposed treatment option is justifiable for the safety improvement of a given grade crossing considering all public grade crossings across North Carolina. A similar approach was considered by Cooper et al (2007) for safety improvement of grade crossings in California.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Volmer et al (2006) applied benefit-cost ratio for project selection to improve the safety of grade crossings in Iowa. Similarly, Rezvani et al (2015) employed a benefit-cost approach to determine if a proposed treatment option is justifiable for the safety improvement of a given grade crossing considering all public grade crossings across North Carolina. A similar approach was considered by Cooper et al (2007) for safety improvement of grade crossings in California.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, one needs to assess both the safety effect and the costs while selecting a countermeasure. At an individual project level, a simple cost-benefit analysis could be helpful to select the appropriate treatment option (Volmer et al 2006;Cooper et al 2007;Rezvani et al 2015;Fu et al 2016). However, when it comes to allocating resources by a federal government at its regional network level, a holistic approach considering the overall benefits is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational experiments demonstrated that the proposed mathematical modeling approach was more accurate than the developed sorting heuristics. Rezvani et al [38] proposed a benefit-cost methodology for highway-rail grade crossing safety protocols to be utilized for prioritization of safety improvement projects. The proposed methodology included five major steps: (1) measuring the accident cost; (2) cost-based screening; (3) benefit-cost analysis; (4) project prioritization; and (5) funding.…”
Section: Resource Allocation Studies For Highway-rail Grade Crossingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light rail systems can be integrated into a variety of land use environments, ranging from suburban to high-density central business district (CBD) areas, and can run on a variety of right-of-way styles [9][10][11]. Policymakers should justify the costs and benefits of a crossing safety improvement project to compile information for communicating with the public and government agencies [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priority given to LRV will also cause additional delays and if delays are unacceptable, transport and traffic management strategies are required to improve the traffic situation and pedestrian crossings with an acceptable threshold [13][14][15]. Policymakers should justify the costs and benefits of a crossing safety improvement project to compile information for communicating with the public and government agencies [12]. e disparity between the minimum travel time and the real travel time, or the difference between the planned and actual travel time, is the basic definition of delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%