2011
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.051441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefit from autologous stem cell transplantation in primary refractory myeloma? Different outcomes in progressive versus stable disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rosinol et al reported that patients with stable disease after induction therapy have an outcome comparable to those with chemosensitive disease. 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosinol et al reported that patients with stable disease after induction therapy have an outcome comparable to those with chemosensitive disease. 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spanish myeloma group looked at the outcome of outcome of primary refractory MM, which they defined as never having achieved a minimal response or better [63]. Patients underwent either tandem autologous or autologous HCT followed by RIC allogeneic transplantation.…”
Section: Hct For Patients With Refractory Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence to support a first auto-HCT for refractory disease (defined as < partial response (PR) to induction therapy) is generally limited to older retrospective studies (Table 4). Based on this literature even patients with refractory disease can gain some benefit from auto-HCT, though this is probably less true for patients with overtly progressive disease [20]. It is also important to mention that data from these studies are from the early 2000s, such that a patient refractory to novel therapies may have a different clinical course.…”
Section: Auto-hct Versus Conventional Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 97%