Benefits and barriers of construction health and safety management (HSM)

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this study is to investigate the perceptions of practitioners working within the UK design organisations on the perceived benefits of health and safety management (HSM). It further explores whether these perceptions could be influenced by the external factors such as the length of service in employment, organisation size, and the professional disciplines and educational backgrounds of the respondents. The study proposes the HSM index, an indicator reflecting the level of benefits from HSM approaches within the construction sector. Design/methodology/approach -Using a data triangulation approach involving quantitative and qualitative methods and a KAP (knowledge, attitudes and perceptions) approach, a total of 110 questionnaires were distributed to the practitioners drawn from the small and medium sized design organisations within the UK, of which only 30 were deemed usable, giving a response rate of 27.3 per cent. Findings -The ranking analysis suggest that "safer workplace", "enhanced company reputation", and "decrease in accidents" as the most important benefits arising from deployment of HSM programmes among the practitioners whereas "improved work performance", "increased organisational performance ", and "reduced sickness and absence from work" though least ranked, still attained medium level of benefits. The findings further identified organisational skills as the most desirable for the effective implementation of safety management by project managers. The overall weighted HSM Index of 3.68 implies that the small and medium sized UK constructional related organisations perceive the benefits that arise from the deployment of HSM systems as medium. Originality/value -The findings may help construction practitioners in reviewing decisions factors when they consider implementing HSM during the various stages of the construction process, from feasibility, design, tender and actual construction stage, also for improving their HSM approaches through considerations of the cognitive impacts.

Holistic View on Multi-Stakeholders’ Influence on Health and Safety Risk Management in Construction Projects in Tanzania

“…Several studies have been conducted on project stakeholders' influence on health and safety risk management. Some of the authors have focused on safety responsibility among designers during the design phase [8][9][10][11] while others focused on the role of clients on health and safety management [12][13][14][15][16]. They maintain that clients have a major role in project implementation, and therefore, they should push for the safety requirements.…”

Issues of construction health and safety in developing countries: a case of Jordan

“…Whilst the governments and industry bodies of developed countries acknowledge that the construction industry's undesirable accident record must be improved (Chileshe and Dzisi 2012), with many advocating the adoption of a zero accident policy (Jill and John 2010), poor safety records continue to hinder performance improvement. This is particularly evident in developing countries where a dearth of reliable information on occupational accidents exists due to the absence of proper recording and notification systems, coupled with low construction H&S awareness (Fang et al 2004, Paivi et al 2006, Hamalainen et al 2007, Chiocha et al 2011.…”

Securing the embeddedness of psychosocial diffusion indicators into the Turkish construction industry

“…In this regard, the parameters with low REI values were deemed areas that needed primary attention. However, where two or more factors had the same score, the one with the lowest standard deviation was assigned the highest importance ranking (Chileshe and Dzisi, 2012). If they also had the same standard deviation, they shared the arithmetic mean of the ranking they occupied.…”