2019
DOI: 10.1177/0098628319888088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of a Low-Stakes Write-to-Learn Assignment on Exam Performance

Abstract: This study examined whether a low-stakes write-to-learn (WTL) assignment improved exam performance. Students in one section of a child development course completed five assignments during a semester, whereby they identified 15 key concepts and related them to six themes (e.g., nature and nurture). Students in another section did not. Students who completed the WTL assignments performed significantly better in Exams 2 and 3 than students in the control condition. Within-group analyses indicated that only the st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of using a low-stakes writing assignment would be to support technical learning goals of the course. Stevenson (2020) finds that using low-stakes writing helped improve student performance in connecting concepts and broader organizational themes of the course as demonstrated through test performance. Other examples mentioned in Section 2 are Saulnier (2016), Sharp et al (1999), Elder and Champine (2016), and Theoret and Luna (2009).…”
Section: Principles Of Instructional Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of using a low-stakes writing assignment would be to support technical learning goals of the course. Stevenson (2020) finds that using low-stakes writing helped improve student performance in connecting concepts and broader organizational themes of the course as demonstrated through test performance. Other examples mentioned in Section 2 are Saulnier (2016), Sharp et al (1999), Elder and Champine (2016), and Theoret and Luna (2009).…”
Section: Principles Of Instructional Designmentioning
confidence: 99%