2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2014.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benefits of e-learning in chemotherapy pharmacology education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was similar to the findings of previous studies where significant learning gain occurred. 1,3,4,8 An absolute learning gain is difference between post-test score and pre-test score. Authors have observed the absolute learning gain of 23.3% that in trend with the earlier study of e-learning in pharmacy education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding was similar to the findings of previous studies where significant learning gain occurred. 1,3,4,8 An absolute learning gain is difference between post-test score and pre-test score. Authors have observed the absolute learning gain of 23.3% that in trend with the earlier study of e-learning in pharmacy education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific learning objectives were framed and discussed. 4 short interrelated interactive presentations were prepared for e-learning with the help of other faculties of department. Topics covered under each module were as following.…”
Section: Preparation Of E-learning Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the fifty-six studies that were reviewed, all were limited by methodological flaws. Thirty (53.6%) studies [11,12,[14][15][16][17]19,20,22,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][35][36][37]43,46,47,49,[52][53][54]56,58,63,64] did not establish the baseline knowledge, confidence or skills of participants and this is significant in two regards: It does not allow accurate comparison between groups, as differences in baseline knowledge may be responsible for differences in final knowledge; and it does not allow the impact of the intervention in increasing students' performance to be quantified. Three (5.4%) [25,55,57] of the nine studies that reviewed blended learning methods, failed to assess the effectiveness of the e-learning intervention independently of the face-to-face teaching.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are therefore vulnerable to response bias as well as recall bias, when participants were required to make a post-intervention assessment of their pre-intervention skills, knowledge or confidence [65,66]. Several studies were limited by their small sample size [11,16,29,30,34,36,59,61] and only four studies [9,32,43,57] reported calculation of sufficient power to detect a statistically significant difference. Twelve studies (21.4%) had a poor response rate (less than 60%) [9,10,12,14,18,19,22,39,40,46 ,60,62] and four (7.1%) studies [26,29,37,53] did not report response rate.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tools presented in this work achieved a connection between the theoretical explanations and the laboratory practices using augmented reality as a nexus. Another study assessed elearning tools for the mechanisms of action of chemotherapy drugs, and the subsequent effects on learning in two cohorts (control and intervention) of undergraduate pharmacy students [12]. The intervention group had access to the e-learning tools in addition to the traditional didactic teaching delivered to the control group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%