The term
shaken baby syndrome
(SBS), defined by the triad of retinal hemorrhage (RH), encephalopathy, and subdural hemorrhage (SDH), despite being widely accepted for 40 years, can no longer be regarded as a valid diagnosis. Multiple lines of evidence, from biomechanics to advances in understanding the anatomy and pathophysiology of the developing infant brain and its coverings, have undermined the diagnosis, and the nomenclature has been revised to reflect this.
It is important to shift the focus to the objective pathological findings in babies with these closely interrelated phenomena rather than speculating on mechanisms; the term retino‐dural haemorrhage of infancy more accurately characterizes this syndrome.
RHs have many causes and are more common after natural disease and accidents than after inflicted injury. Encephalopathy results from hypoxic‐ischemic injury rather than from traumatic axonal injury. Trauma is a cause of infant SDH, but there are many natural causes; almost half of normal newborns have SDH identified on brain scan. Infant SDH is usually a thin bilateral film, its source traditionally ascribed to torn bridging veins, but this remains unproved and is rarely documented. The dura is an alternative source; the infant dura is richly vascularized and innervated and bleeding into it is common. SDH evolves into a reactive membrane containing thin‐walled capillaries. Recurrent bleeding into these membranes is seen on microscopy. In some cases, SDH evolves into a chronic fluid collection; the causes for this are unknown.
Biomechanical studies have shown that the forces generated by shaking are far less than those resulting from impact, but it remains correct to advise parents that babies should never be shaken.
This article examines the pathology of each of these signs and their pathophysiology.
The importance of considering the birth, early clinical history, and predisposing vulnerabilities when examining a case of suspected abuse is emphasized.