2010
DOI: 10.1021/jm901672k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benzimidazole Derivatives as New Serotonin 5-HT6 Receptor Antagonists. Molecular Mechanisms of Receptor Inactivation

Abstract: On the basis of our previously described pharmacophore model for serotonin 5-HT(6) receptor (5-HT(6)R) antagonists, we have designed, synthesized, and pharmacologically characterized a series of benzimidazole derivatives 1-20 that represent a new family of potent antagonists at the human 5-HT(6)R. Site-directed mutagenesis and a beta(2)-adrenoceptor-based homology model of the 5-HT(6)R were used to predict the mode of binding of antagonist SB-258585 and the new synthesized ligands. Substitution of W6.48, F6.52… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(151 reference statements)
2
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding mode of the synthesized compounds was investigated with docking experiments to the homology models of 5-HT 6 R (see Supporting Information). Both the basic and nonbasic analogues exhibited very consistent binding modes (Figure 2), overlapping with the previously reported data: 23 the peripheral aromatic group formed stacking interactions with phenylalanines F 6×51 and F 6×52 , and the sulfonyl group of the ligands formed a hydrogen bond with N 6×55 , in line with the mutagenetic data. 24 In addition, a protonated nitrogen atom of the basic analogues formed a charge-assisted hydrogen bond with D 3×32 , exhibiting the classical binding mode for the basic compounds.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The binding mode of the synthesized compounds was investigated with docking experiments to the homology models of 5-HT 6 R (see Supporting Information). Both the basic and nonbasic analogues exhibited very consistent binding modes (Figure 2), overlapping with the previously reported data: 23 the peripheral aromatic group formed stacking interactions with phenylalanines F 6×51 and F 6×52 , and the sulfonyl group of the ligands formed a hydrogen bond with N 6×55 , in line with the mutagenetic data. 24 In addition, a protonated nitrogen atom of the basic analogues formed a charge-assisted hydrogen bond with D 3×32 , exhibiting the classical binding mode for the basic compounds.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…5-HT binds closely to the TM3− TM6 region, thus engaging a further interaction with TM5 Thr 5.46 , while the antagonist is proposed to bind to the TM6, TM7, and TM1 regions. Another hypothesis has recently been proposed by de la Fuente et al 32 to explain the inactivation of the receptor by the antagonist. Beginning with the general consideration of GPCR activation occurring through TM helix dynamics 33 and because of site-directed mutagenesis, the authors have proposed a basis for the molecular mechanism underlying 5-HT 6 R inactivation.…”
Section: Structure Of 5-ht 6 Rmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Representative ligand 1 ( K i  = 34 nM) contains 4-methylpiperazine moiety as PI pharmacophore element, a carbonyl group as HBA, and a naphthalene ring as HYD (Fig. 1B)9. In the present work we further explore the benzimidazole system as a central scaffold to identify 5-HT 6 R antagonists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%