2019
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2019.2938909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BER Analysis of NOMA-Enabled Visible Light Communication Systems With Different Modulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless otherwise stated, U2 adopts .5; 2/ MPPM. Considering that different users' signals encounter different channel gains, the SER and ADR performances of different users are evaluated with the same transmitting SNR to provide a fair comparison [34,35] . The relationship between transmitting SNR and the average electrical SNR at the k-th user can be expressed as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unless otherwise stated, U2 adopts .5; 2/ MPPM. Considering that different users' signals encounter different channel gains, the SER and ADR performances of different users are evaluated with the same transmitting SNR to provide a fair comparison [34,35] . The relationship between transmitting SNR and the average electrical SNR at the k-th user can be expressed as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [35], Liu et al derived closed-form BER expressions for M-ary phase shift keying, M-ary pulse amplitude modulation, and M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation in NOMA-VLC systems with two users. To mitigate the effect of EP on the error performance of NOMA-VLC systems, some approaches have been proposed in recent works.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting study was reported in [39], where authors studied optimal power allocation for NOMA-VLC for both static users and mobile users under CSI uncertainties. In [40], the authors studied the bit error rate performance of NOMA-VLC under different modulation schemes. The study in [41] compared NOMA and OMA schemes in the VLC environment, where the users report positional information (vertical and horizontal) instead of reporting the full channel-state-information, which can significantly simplify the implementation.…”
Section: List Of Symbols αmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [41], the symbol error rate (SER) of C-NOMA-based VLC system was investigated, where users exhibited identical error rate performance at different locations. On the other hand, recently published papers showed that P-NOMA is a rather efficient MA scheme in VLC systems, due to the aforementioned reasons [53], [56], [57]. Furthermore, reported results showed that NOMA 2 outperforms OMA techniques, such as OFDMA and TDMA, in terms of system capacity and number of simultaneously served users, particularly in single-input single-output broadcast channels and for certain channel strength disparities among users [58]- [61].…”
Section: Noma In Vlcmentioning
confidence: 99%