1967
DOI: 10.1007/bf01111354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

�ber Fl�chen mit einer Weingartenschen Ungleichung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This proves that the quasi-CMC 3 Smooth embedded spheres satisfying the Alexandrov inequality (A.2) condition (1.2) in Theorem 1.1 cannot be weakened to its natural limit, given by (2.1). These examples are similar to a construction in [39]. Then, we can glue α with its reflection across the z = z(b) line in the x, z-plane, and rotate this curve around the z-axis to obtain an embedded rotational sphere in R 3 , which can obviously be constructed with C ∞ regularity by choosing κ(s) adequately.…”
Section: A Appendix: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This proves that the quasi-CMC 3 Smooth embedded spheres satisfying the Alexandrov inequality (A.2) condition (1.2) in Theorem 1.1 cannot be weakened to its natural limit, given by (2.1). These examples are similar to a construction in [39]. Then, we can glue α with its reflection across the z = z(b) line in the x, z-plane, and rotate this curve around the z-axis to obtain an embedded rotational sphere in R 3 , which can obviously be constructed with C ∞ regularity by choosing κ(s) adequately.…”
Section: A Appendix: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the real analytic case, Theorem 1.1 was previously known, after a theorem of Voss and Münzner (see Satz III in [39]): Any real analytic immersed sphere in R 3 satisfying (κ 1 − c)(κ 2 − c) ≤ 0 for some c > 0 is a sphere of radius 1/c. The analyticity assumption in this result cannot be removed, by the examples given in Lemma A.2, or in Panina [42].…”
Section: And Equality Holds Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the real analytic case, Theorem 1.1 was previously known, after a theorem of Voss and Münzner (see Satz III in [38]): Any real analytic immersed sphere in R 3 satisfying (κ 1 − c)(κ 2 − c) ≤ 0 for some c > 0 is a sphere of radius 1/c. The analyticity assumption in this result cannot be removed, by the examples given in Lemma A.2, or in Panina [41].…”
Section: Discussion Sharpness and Consequences Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This proves that the quasi-CMC condition (1.2) in Theorem 1.1 cannot be weakened to its natural limit, given by (2.1). These examples are similar to a construction in [38]. Then, we can glue α with its reflection across the z = z(b) line in the x, z-plane, and rotate this curve around the z-axis to obtain an embedded rotational sphere Σ in R 3 , which can obviously be constructed with C ∞ regularity by choosing κ(s) adequately.…”
Section: A Appendix: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, if we slightly weaken the ellipticity condition g < 0 to the degenerate elliptic case g ≤ 0, the umbilics of a Weingarten surface satisfying κ 2 = g(κ 1 ) fail to be isolated in general, see [29,19]. Specifically, there exist examples of such degenerate elliptic Weingarten equations where one can bifurcate from a totally umbilic sphere meeting the rotation axis, to create nonround, degenerate elliptic, rotational Weingarten spheres.…”
Section: The Non-elliptic Casementioning
confidence: 99%