Best antenna arrangements for partial discharge detection in medium voltage switchgear

Permal, Navinesshani; Amir, Mohd Dzaki Mohd; Chakrabarty, Chandan Kumar; Ramasamy, Agileswari K.

doi:10.1109/scored.2017.8305350

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One of the main factors affecting PD localization accuracy is the arrangement of the sensors or antennas outside the switchgear panel or inside the transformer tank [14,15]. Permal et al [16] carried out an experimental study for PD detection and localization in the MV switchgear to improve the localization accuracy in reference [13] by determining the best arrangement of radiometric antennas.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Defect Localization Inside Simulated MV Switchgear Based on Cumulative Energy Curve Using Transient Earth Voltage Sensors

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The partial discharge (PD) leads to catastrophic failure of the medium voltage (MV) switchgear insulation. Determination of the PD source (defect) location in high voltage (HV) equipment is very important in the maintenance procedures and in isolating the root cause of PD generation. In this paper, the transient earth voltage (TEV) detection method was used to acquire defect-initiated PD signals in a simulated MV switchgear model. An array of four TEV sensors were placed on the surface walls outside an MV switchgear tank to acquire the PD signals generated from the known location(s)/coordinates of sharp needle type defect inside the tank. The time difference of arrival (TDOA) between signals that are captured by the TEV sensors array was critically analyzed. Estimating the TDOA between PD signals generated by PD source at a known location with high accuracy is of great importance for accurate defect localization. The cumulative energy method (CEM) is used to estimate the onset time point of each TEV signal. The estimated TDOA by the cumulative energy method is compared with actual and expected TDOA based on known coordinates of PD source and TEV sensors. Experimental data are used as a basis for determining the TEV method accuracy for PD source localization. Experimental results show the average error of time difference is about 1.34 ns, which is equivalent to the propagation distance of 0.4 m.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%