2014
DOI: 10.1186/2050-7283-2-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practice in bereavement photography after perinatal death: qualitative analysis with 104 parents

Abstract: BackgroundPostmortem memento photography has emerged in Western hospitals as part of compassionate bereavement care for parents facing perinatal death. Many parents endorse this psychosocial intervention, yet implementation varies greatly and little research on parents’ specific needs guides health care professionals. Parents are in crisis and vulnerable after the death of their child, thus best practice is crucial. This study contributes 104 parents’ experiences and opinions toward the understanding of best p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
59
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they look to their healthcare providers for guidance on how to accomplish this, and expressed wishes and regrets related to what did not occur in terms of memories and bonding. These findings are consistent with research suggesting that parents want options for memory making and encouragement from healthcare providers if they are initially hesitant, and regret what they did not do, for example in the realm of bereavement photography [ 28 ]. Additionally, they expressed the need to feel supported, respected and nurtured in the process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, they look to their healthcare providers for guidance on how to accomplish this, and expressed wishes and regrets related to what did not occur in terms of memories and bonding. These findings are consistent with research suggesting that parents want options for memory making and encouragement from healthcare providers if they are initially hesitant, and regret what they did not do, for example in the realm of bereavement photography [ 28 ]. Additionally, they expressed the need to feel supported, respected and nurtured in the process.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Los rituales post mortem son reportados por la literatura como una forma de facilitar los recuerdos [19][20][21][22] , aunque se desconoce hasta qué punto estas acciones pueden ayudar el proceso de duelo 20 . En su revisión sistemática Gold y Cols 21 describen varias prácticas relacionadas con la generación de recuerdos, entre ellas la fotografía postmortem, ver y sostener al bebé y desarrollar ceremonias privadas.…”
Section: Prácticas De Soporteunclassified
“…La fotografía postmortem tiene un lugar privilegiado. Blood y Cacciatore 19 comentan que la utilización de la fotografía postmortem tiene un gran valor; perder la oportunidad de tomar una fotografía en el momento de crisis podría ser irremediable y una fuente de arrepentimiento. Estos mismos autores en otro artículo, concluyeron que entre más joven sea el infante, más dados van a estar los padres a esta práctica 23 .…”
Section: Prácticas De Soporteunclassified
“…A wide range of literature exists about best practices in bereavement during perinatal death Blood and Cacciatore, 2014 ). However, the so-called facilitative and non-facilitative actions are not exempt from controversy or conflicting opinions, such as the relationship between contact with the newborn and its subsequent implications on the mother's mental health .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were collected through three focus groups between February 2012 and March 2014. Focus groups allow researchers to explore the nature and effects of ongoing social discourse, of social practice, and collective meaning making ( Barbour, 2007;Kamberelis and Dimitriadis, 2011 ). Focus groups are suitable in interpretive phenomenology because they foster the enrichment of data brought about by the interaction of participants and are useful to researchers for cross-checking and clarification ( Bradbury- Jones et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%