2022
DOI: 10.1186/s41120-021-00050-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Best practices for the development and fit-for-purpose validation of biomarker methods: a conference report

Abstract: This conference report summarized a full-day workshop, “best practices for the development and fit-for-purpose validation of biomarker methods,” which was held prior to the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) PharmSci360 Congress, San Antonio, TX, November 2019. The purpose of the workshop was to bring together thought leaders in biomarker assay development in order to identify which assay parameters and key statistical measures need to be considered when developing a biomarker assay. A di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…l -Glutamine- 13 C 5 , 15 N 2 was used as an internal standard (ISTD) for the bioanalytical method based on its structural similarity to the analytes. Fit-for-purpose method validation has been performed for the developed method according to the guidelines. , The bioanalytical method was validated for its accuracy, precision, and linearity over the operating range. The linearity range for MDA was selected based on its reported levels in humans .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…l -Glutamine- 13 C 5 , 15 N 2 was used as an internal standard (ISTD) for the bioanalytical method based on its structural similarity to the analytes. Fit-for-purpose method validation has been performed for the developed method according to the guidelines. , The bioanalytical method was validated for its accuracy, precision, and linearity over the operating range. The linearity range for MDA was selected based on its reported levels in humans .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fit-for-purpose method validation has been performed for the developed method according to the guidelines. 40,41 The bioanalytical method was validated for its accuracy, precision, and linearity over the operating range. The linearity range for MDA was selected based on its reported levels in humans.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there is no commonly accepted definition for “standardization”, “optimization”, “qualification”, or “pre-validation”. Not only is there confusion in the terminology, but there could also be different processes of “validation” for different assays, as each assay needs to be validated by “fit-for-purpose” [ 40 ]. In other words, depending on the characteristics and/or usage of the assay, different assays could be validated differently.…”
Section: Assay Standardization Qualification and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%