2017
DOI: 10.1136/vr.j1635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BestBETs for Vets

Abstract: BestBETs for Vets are generated by the Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine at the University of Nottingham to help answer specific questions and assist in clinical decision making. Although evidence is often limited, they aim to find, present and draw conclusions from the best available evidence, using a standardised framework. A more detailed description of how BestBETs for Vets are produced was published in a previous issue of Veterinary Record (, April 4, 2015, pp 354-356).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the relevant papers were analysed separately. A Vet Record paper reporting the findings from the first time this search was run2 was also excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Search Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the relevant papers were analysed separately. A Vet Record paper reporting the findings from the first time this search was run2 was also excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Search Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an updated version of a clinical decision making article originally published in Vet Record in April 2017 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practitioners should be aware that the swapping of HP-CIAs to non-critical alternatives may result in an increase in overall AMU as measured by mass-based methodologies, due to the Treatment of bacterial reproductive disease, such as metritis, with antimicrobials can be justiied; however, cases of retained fetal membranes in the absence of pyrexia should not need antimicrobial treatment (Drillich and others 2006). While the treatment of clinical endometritis with intrauterine cephapirin has been shown in several studies to improve reproductive outcomes (Hyde and Brennan 2017), the use of antimicrobial treatments for reasons other than cow health may be challenging to justify. Alternatives to antimicrobials, such as prostaglandin treatments, are widely used, although their eicacy in improving reproductive outcomes has been questioned (Haimerl and others 2013).…”
Section: Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 99%