2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beta-2 adrenergic receptor variants are associated with subcutaneous fat accumulation in response to long-term overfeeding

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:The effects of alpha-2A (A2A)-, beta-2 (B2)-and beta-3 (B3)-adrenergic receptor (ADR) gene polymorphisms on adiposity, fat distribution and plasma insulin and leptin changes in response to long-term overfeeding were explored. METHODS: Twenty four men (mean ( AE s.d.) age 21 AE 2 y) who constituted 12 pairs of identical twins ate a 4.2 MJ=day energy surplus, 6 days a week, for a period of 100 days. Total body fat was assessed by hydrodensitometry and total subcutaneous fat by the sum of eight skinfold… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a small study of 12 monozygotic male twin pairs, the Glu27 allele was associated with a greater increase in total CTmeasured subcutaneous fat and total weight gain in response to long-term overfeeding (Po0.005). 26 Two recent reports addressing the relationship between ADRB2 and fat measures quantified by CT from the HERITAGE study have produced evidence for association, but only in subgroups. The first 27 examined the Arg16Gly, but not the Gln27Glu, polymorphism with respect to response to endurance training in AA and Caucasian subjects, reporting no significant main-effect association between this polymorphism and change in CTmeasured visceral fat area, although they did report an interaction between Arg16Gly and a polymorphism in the beta-3 adrenergic receptor on change in total abdominal fat area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a small study of 12 monozygotic male twin pairs, the Glu27 allele was associated with a greater increase in total CTmeasured subcutaneous fat and total weight gain in response to long-term overfeeding (Po0.005). 26 Two recent reports addressing the relationship between ADRB2 and fat measures quantified by CT from the HERITAGE study have produced evidence for association, but only in subgroups. The first 27 examined the Arg16Gly, but not the Gln27Glu, polymorphism with respect to response to endurance training in AA and Caucasian subjects, reporting no significant main-effect association between this polymorphism and change in CTmeasured visceral fat area, although they did report an interaction between Arg16Gly and a polymorphism in the beta-3 adrenergic receptor on change in total abdominal fat area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research investigating the relationship between ADRB2 and more direct measures of fat deposition, such as computed tomography (CT)-assessed visceral and subcutaneous fat mass, however, has been limited. A small twin study 26 and one report from the HERITAGE study 27 have provided some evidence of an effect of this gene on regional fat distribution. Both of these studies were interventional; however, with the first examining response to overfeeding and the second assessing response to endurance training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This is in line with our findings since lipolysis and fat oxidation during exercise were higher in our Gln27Gln group as compared to the Glu27Glu group, so again, the Gln27Gln genotype (lacking the Glu27 allele) seems to benefit more from exercise. Studies with identical twins would have provided clearer evidence, 39 but neither twins, nor siblings were found in our obese population, so homozygous Glu27Glu obese women were matched with other group of homozygous Gln27Gln women. This design has also been reported in similar studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, one genetic variation in the ADRB2 gene accounted for only about 7% of the variance 419 (differences) in weight gain in this study and the effect of other genetic variations was 420,421,422,423 smaller.…”
Section: Genewatch Uk January 2006mentioning
confidence: 97%