Beta-lactam resistance in enterobacteria isolated from animal and water

Cicuta, M. E.; Roibón, W. R.; Barceló, M. C.; Arzú, O. R.; Amable, V. I.

doi:10.30972/vet.251540

Cited by 1 publication

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Only three articles [ 35 , 42 , 50 ] identified unrestricted, unregulated, or recent use of antimicrobials in humans as a human contribution to the problem. Cicuta et al [ 55 ] did not identify any human input but acknowledged the need to have an interdisciplinary approach to implement human and animal health-oriented research. Only Perhsson et al [ 50 ] gave direct evidence of the human role in the generation of AMR; they proved that humans modify microbiomes and resistomes in rural settings by interacting with animals and the environment by means of horizontal transfer of AMR determinants.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only dos Vieira et al [ 47 ] focused on AMR in shrimp production. Some studies considered the input of other domestic animal species [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 55 ] such as sheep, ducks, pigeons, horses, dogs, or guinea pigs. Corzo-Ariyama et al [ 54 ] did not specify the type of animal under study; their focus was solely on identifying AMR patterns from bacteria in produce; therefore, they recognised the animal role in the spread of AMR more generally.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast, Cicuta et al [ 55 ] did not acknowledge any of the above-mentioned contributions of animals to the generation and spread of AMR, but only discussed the phenotypic resistance screening results and their likely cellular resistance mechanisms.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Interestingly, Miranda et al [ 48 ] pointed at feed and influent water—as opposed to effluent water—as reservoirs for AMR bacteria in salmon farms. On the other hand, Armas Freire et al [ 35 ] and Cicuta et al [ 55 ] did not address any environmental contributions to the AMR problem.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only three articles [35,42,50] identified unrestricted, unregulated, or recent use of antimicrobials in humans as a human contribution to the problem. Cicuta et al [55] did not identify any human input but acknowledged the need to have an interdisciplinary approach to implement human and As shown in Table 1, in most articles, only two OH components were considered, either in the discussion or the description of the sampling procedures. Only Braykov et al [37], Brisola et al [38], dos Vieira et al [47], Miranda et al [48], and Palhares et al [49] discussed all three components, but their study designs did not include sampling for all of them.…”

Section: Human Contributionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Antimicrobial Resistance in Rural Settings in Latin America: A Scoping Review with a One Health Lens

Medina-Pizzali

Hartinger

Salmón-Mulanovich

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in rural Latin America is not fully understood. The transmission pathways are partially known since research predominantly focuses on the urban hospital setting. The contribution to AMR from environmental factors is usually only mentioned in large-scale animal production. To understand the state of the literature on AMR in rural LA, we carried out a scoping review using the One Health (OH) perspective. OH recognises the concomitant contributions and interconnectedness of humans, animal, and the environment, thus, we used the OH perspective to select those articles adopting a holistic view of the problem. We searched original articles in English, Spanish, and Portuguese in four peer-reviewed databases and included 21 publications in the analysis. We charted data on bibliometrics, design, data collection sources, and instruments. We identified the human, animal, and environmental contributions to AMR in rural locations, and information gaps on AMR transmission routes and AMR drivers. Intensive and non-intensive animal production systems and agricultural practices were the most frequently found human contributions to AMR. Poultry, swine, cattle, and fish were the most frequent livestock mentioned as sources of AMR bacteria. Animal carriage and/or transfer of AMR determinants or bacteria was recognised as the primary contribution of livestock to the problem, while water, soil, and farming were predominant environmental contributions. We found that only 1 article out of 21 considered the OH approach as a framework for their sampling scheme, whereas 5 out 21 discussed all the three OH components. There were hardly any descriptions of humans or human waste as reservoirs for AMR in rural locations, and rural health centres or hospitals and wildlife were not represented. No studies identified mining as an anthropogenic activity driving AMR. More OH-oriented studies, with emphasis on molecular approaches—for identification and comparison of AMR genes—are sorely needed to understand better the existence of a network of interconnected transmission routes in rural Latin America and provide efficient strategies to prevent further AMR emergence.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only three articles [35,42,50] identified unrestricted, unregulated, or recent use of antimicrobials in humans as a human contribution to the problem. Cicuta et al [55] did not identify any human input but acknowledged the need to have an interdisciplinary approach to implement human and As shown in Table 1, in most articles, only two OH components were considered, either in the discussion or the description of the sampling procedures. Only Braykov et al [37], Brisola et al [38], dos Vieira et al [47], Miranda et al [48], and Palhares et al [49] discussed all three components, but their study designs did not include sampling for all of them.…”

Section: Human Contributionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations