Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/n19-1079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Better Modeling of Incomplete Annotations for Named Entity Recognition

Abstract: Supervised approaches to named entity recognition (NER) are largely developed based on the assumption that the training data is fully annotated with named entity information. However, in practice, annotated data can often be imperfect with one typical issue being the training data may contain incomplete annotations. We highlight several pitfalls associated with learning under such a setup in the context of NER and identify limitations associated with existing approaches, proposing a novel yet easy-to-implement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Partial annotation in various forms has also been studied in the contexts of POS-tagging (Mori et al, 2015), word sense disambiguation (Hovy and Hovy, 2012), temporal relation extraction (Ning et al, 2018), dependency parsing (Flannery et al, 2012), and named entity recognition (Jie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Partial annotation in various forms has also been studied in the contexts of POS-tagging (Mori et al, 2015), word sense disambiguation (Hovy and Hovy, 2012), temporal relation extraction (Ning et al, 2018), dependency parsing (Flannery et al, 2012), and named entity recognition (Jie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this formulation assumes that all possible sequences are equally likely. To address this, Jie et al (2019) introduced a way to weigh sequences.…”
Section: Neural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This includes statistic methods, such as SVM (Isozaki and Kazawa, 2002), HMMs (Bikel et al, 1997) and CRF (Lafferty et al, 2001), suffering from feature engineering. There are also a number of recent neural network approaches applied to NER, such as (Collobert et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2015;Lample et al, 2016;Ma and Hovy, 2016;Chiu and Nichols, 2016;Akbik et al, 2018;Jie et al, 2019;Akbik et al, 2019 (Bastings et al, 2017;Yao et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2018;Mishra et al, 2019;Cao et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019). Cetoli et al (2017) use GCN to investigate the role of the dependency tree in English named entity recognition.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes statistic methods, such as SVM (Isozaki and Kazawa, 2002), HMMs (Bikel et al, 1997) and CRF (Lafferty et al, 2001), suffering from feature engineering. There are also a number of recent neural network approaches applied to NER, such as (Collobert et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2015;Lample et al, 2016;Ma and Hovy, 2016;Chiu and Nichols, 2016;Akbik et al, 2018;Jie et al, 2019;Akbik et al, 2019). Compared with English, Chinese is not featured with obvious word boundaries, but it is important to leverage word boundaries and semantic information in Chinese NER.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%