Better Safe than Sorry: A Study of Investigating Individuals’ Protection of Privacy in the Use of Storage as a Cloud Computing Service

Visinescu, Lucian L.; Azogu, Olajumoke; Ryan, Sherry; Wu, Yu; Kim, Dan J.

doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1204838

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 73 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While people are not often aware of how their data are stored and managed (Visinescu et al, 2016), research has demonstrated that people in general are willing to forgo some protection of their private information, whether in aggregate or individually, if they stand to benefit from it (see Dinev & Hart, 2003). With the CPIP, researchers can now (1) measure how people feel about privacy protection in general, and (2) understand the different information privacy domains people most want to protect -psychological, technological, legal, and financial -to see where and why people may be willing to sacrifice their privacy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Online Privacy Breaches, Offline Consequences: Construction and Validation of the Concerns with the Protection of Informational Privacy Scale

Durnell¹,

Okabe‐Miyamoto

Howell

et al. 2020

International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Concerns with protecting privacy, especially of online data, has been a goal of privacy scholarship for years. Because most data are transferred online, many instruments focus on online environments. However, when privacy is invaded and data mishandled, the consequences, including the emotional ramifications, extend beyond the online space and into the offline world. Thus, we developed the CPIP, a measure of privacy concern. We were able to (1) determine the top four domains for informational privacy and (2) correlate that concern with emotional outcomes showing people with high concerns felt less calm, less at ease, and angrier, after reading prompts about the right to privacy protection. The CPIP predicts who experiences an emotional reaction to a loss of privacy and steps for Internet providers collecting data online to create a better balance for users and their privacy. This alignment (or misalignment) of attitudes and behaviors challenge the privacy paradox.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Online Privacy Breaches, Offline Consequences: Construction and Validation of the Concerns with the Protection of Informational Privacy Scale

Durnell¹,

Okabe‐Miyamoto

Howell

et al. 2020

International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…PMT is adopted in various IS research, mostly to explore online safety and security behaviors and relevant motivations that can encourage protection of both individuals and organizations. For example, Hooper and Blunt (2019) examined the factors that influence information security behavioral intentions of IT professionals while Visinescu et al (2016) investigated the mechanisms in threat and coping appraisal processes that influence protection strategies of individuals using cloud computing storage services (Storage as a Service [STaaS]). Jansen and van Schaik (2018) examined how fear appeal messages might impact online information sharing behavior showing their effectiveness in promoting security behaviors against phishing attacks.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PMT is adopted in various IS research, mostly to explore online safety and security behaviors and relevant motivations that can encourage protection of both individuals and organizations. For example, Hooper and Blunt (2019) examined the factors that influence information security behavioral intentions of IT professionals while Visinescu et al (2016) 1996)'s concern for information privacy instrument, privacy concerns regarding one's information disclosure involve several threats related to the collection, secondary use and sharing of personal information, as well as improper access from unauthorized entities, and errors in storage of such information by organizations and service providers. Since PMT focuses on how individuals respond when receiving threatening information about situations they are engaging in, it can be inferred that in the context of privacy, the act of disclosure (i.e., providing personal sensitive information to online providers) can be a risky behavior.…”

Section: Pmt and Privacy Threat Appraisalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dispositional mindfulness as an antecedent of privacy concerns: A protection motivation theory perspective

Ioannou

Tussyadiah

Marshan

2021

Psychology and Marketing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates the effects of mindfulness, an important personality trait, on people's perceptions of privacy. Using protection motivation theory as a conceptual foundation, the central tenet is that mindfulness plays an important role in people's threat appraisal process of privacy concerns and thus influences one's intention to share personal information online. A survey‐based approach was employed to measure privacy attitudes of 685 UK individuals about online data disclosure. Our findings demonstrate that mindfulness contributes to the formation of privacy concerns. A more mindful consumer is more likely to adopt a more objective appraisal style, interpret privacy threats as less threatening, and thus share personal information online.

show abstract

“…The topic "Privacy of user information" is closely related to cloud technologies, since data storage in cloud services leads to certain risks for users [Li et al ., 2014;Chandramohan et al ., 2015;Visinescu et al ., 2016] . In addition, there is a connection between re- Note: the topic numbers and constructs are generated automatically, the topics are named by the authors after studying the content of each topic .…”

Section: Findings From the Topic Modelling Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Consumer digital trust: The main trends and research directions

Rebiazina

Tunkevichus²

2022

RMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this paper is to systematize the research on the consumer digital trust from 2016 to 2022 and to determine existing and future research trends. The authors apply a combined systematic and bibliometric review methodology using Scopus metrics and natural language processing techniques using R. Through an analysis of 173 journal publications from the Scopus database, the authors systemize accumulated knowledge on the topic. As a result, the authors have developed a knowledge map based on keywords, identified and analyzed seminal papers on digital trust, identified the main research directions on this topic, and analyzed their development and perspectives. From a practical point, the results of the study demonstrate that companies not only need to pay attention to the development of consumer trust in service, but that the quality of technical equipment and the security of consumer data are also important. Also, research demonstrates, that while digital trust is generally important for online services, it plays an especially significant role in the sharing economy, e-commerce, and digital health services.

show abstract

Better Safe than Sorry: A Study of Investigating Individuals’ Protection of Privacy in the Use of Storage as a Cloud Computing Service

Cited by 10 publications

References 73 publications

Online Privacy Breaches, Offline Consequences: Construction and Validation of the Concerns with the Protection of Informational Privacy Scale

Online Privacy Breaches, Offline Consequences: Construction and Validation of the Concerns with the Protection of Informational Privacy Scale

Dispositional mindfulness as an antecedent of privacy concerns: A protection motivation theory perspective

Consumer digital trust: The main trends and research directions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About