Between collective and particularistic interests. Ratification of the Prespa Agreement by national parliaments in Greece and North Macedonia

Maatsch, Aleksandra; Kurpiel, Anna

doi:10.1080/14683857.2021.1877911

Cited by 2 publications

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

The Identity Question Regarding the Macedonian Nation and Minorities

Aarbakke

2022

Challenges and Barriers to the European Union Expansion to the Balkan Region

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter intends to outline the place of Macedonia in the nation-building process that took place in South-East Europe with the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. Macedonia became the place where national aspirations converged and came into conflict with each other. This gave it a special role in the national narratives of Bulgaria, Serbia, and Greece both internally and in foreign politics. The (federal) Macedonian state that emerged after WWII sought to carve out its own trajectory in a space that was already occupied physically and ideologically by its neighbours. This led to a conflict that lurked under the surface for most of the Cold War but came out in the open with the dissolution of Yugoslavia. The chapter seeks to clarify some of the central issues related to Macedonian nationality and minorities in the Balkan and European context.

show abstract

The Identity Question Regarding the Macedonian Nation and Minorities

Aarbakke

2022

Challenges and Barriers to the European Union Expansion to the Balkan Region

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Moments mûrs pour résoudre un conflit

Sainovic

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Au centre des débats universitaires et politiques, le concept de maturité de Zartman a fait l’objet de vives critiques. Cette contribution aborde ses lacunes et suggère un raffinement du modèle en vue d’une application plus nuancée afin de comprendre les déterminants du succès de la médiation et le rôle que peut jouer le médiateur pour l’obtenir. L’utilité de la théorie de Zartman est évaluée en comparant deux processus de négociation dans différentes phases du conflit entre le Kosovo et la Serbie, l’échec des pourparlers de Rambouillet (1999) et de la médiation d’Ahtisaari (2006-2007), et le succès de l’accord de Prespa, comparativement aux échecs précédents dans le cas du conflit opposant la Macédoine du Nord à la Grèce. Cet article conclut à l’utilité de la version revisitée du modèle de Zartman : le concept de maturité reste un moyen utile pour analyser le potentiel de paix et expliquer l’échec ou le succès de la médiation internationale.

show abstract

Between collective and particularistic interests. Ratification of the Prespa Agreement by national parliaments in Greece and North Macedonia

Cited by 2 publications

References 24 publications

The Identity Question Regarding the Macedonian Nation and Minorities

The Identity Question Regarding the Macedonian Nation and Minorities

Moments mûrs pour résoudre un conflit

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About