Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies

Abstract

BackgroundMany promising technological innovations in health and social care are characterized by nonadoption or abandonment by individuals or by failed attempts to scale up locally, spread distantly, or sustain the innovation long term at the organization or system level.ObjectiveOur objective was to produce an evidence-based, theory-informed, and pragmatic framework to help predict and evaluate the success of a technology-supported health or social care program.MethodsThe study had 2 parallel components: (1) secondary research (hermeneutic systematic review) to identify key domains, and (2) empirical case studies of technology implementation to explore, test, and refine these domains. We studied 6 technology-supported programs—video outpatient consultations, global positioning system tracking for cognitive impairment, pendant alarm services, remote biomarker monitoring for heart failure, care organizing software, and integrated case management via data sharing—using longitudinal ethnography and action research for up to 3 years across more than 20 organizations. Data were collected at micro level (individual technology users), meso level (organizational processes and systems), and macro level (national policy and wider context). Analysis and synthesis was aided by sociotechnically informed theories of individual, organizational, and system change. The draft framework was shared with colleagues who were introducing or evaluating other technology-supported health or care programs and refined in response to feedback.ResultsThe literature review identified 28 previous technology implementation frameworks, of which 14 had taken a dynamic systems approach (including 2 integrative reviews of previous work). Our empirical dataset consisted of over 400 hours of ethnographic observation, 165 semistructured interviews, and 200 documents. The final nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework included questions in 7 domains: the condition or illness, the technology, the value proposition, the adopter system (comprising professional staff, patient, and lay caregivers), the organization(s), the wider (institutional and societal) context, and the interaction and mutual adaptation between all these domains over time. Our empirical case studies raised a variety of challenges across all 7 domains, each classified as simple (straightforward, predictable, few components), complicated (multiple interacting components or issues), or complex (dynamic, unpredictable, not easily disaggregated into constituent components). Programs characterized by complicatedness proved difficult but not impossible to implement. Those characterized by complexity in multiple NASSS domains rarely, if ever, became mainstreamed. The framework showed promise when applied (both prospectively and retrospectively) to other programs.ConclusionsSubject to further empirical testing, NASSS could be applied across a range of technological innovations in health and social care. It has several potential uses: (1) to inform the desi...

Factors for Supporting Primary Care Physician Engagement With Patient Apps for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management That Link to Primary Care: Interview Study (Preprint)

“…This finding is consistent with other studies: Greenhalgh and colleagues [19] highlighted that often clinicians believed only a small proportion of their patients would be suited to an intervention. However, it should also be noted that smartphone ownership is high in Australia, even in older ages [10].…”

“…Research suggests that their effectiveness is often limited by poor uptake and sustained use by health care providers [18,19]. Recent systematic reviews have suggested that key barriers for health care providers are increased workload, and disruption to existing clinical processes and staff roles as well as concerns about remuneration, data security and liability [18,[20][21][22].…”

Hidden Work and the Challenges of Scalability and Sustainability in Ambulatory Assisted Living

“…If policy makers' plans are to come to come to fruition, then assisted living service innovations must be scalable and sustainable (Greenhalgh et al 2017), which means that they must not only deliver their promised benefits, but do so in ways that are cost effective (van Limburg et al 2011). However, the optimism that has accompanied various initiatives designed to promote the scaling up of assisted living services pilots and demonstrate their sustainability has not been justified by results (Sanders et.…”

“…However, the optimism that has accompanied various initiatives designed to promote the scaling up of assisted living services pilots and demonstrate their sustainability has not been justified by results (Sanders et. 2012;Bentley et al 2014;Cook et al 2016;Merkel and Enste 2016;Greenhalgh et al 2017). Scalability implies that services may be rolled out at multiple sites with minimal adaptation to local settings and service user needs, with "plug and play" representing the ideal scenario ; sustainability implies that costs of running and maintaining the service over time is consistent with the resources available.…”

“…Facilitating both organizational learning and co-production is essential for scalability and sustainability of assisted living services (Greenhalgh et al 2017). From the perspective of health and social care professionals, this requires creating the right intra-and inter-organizational processes, for example, scalability would benefit from enabling staff to evolve standard procedures (e.g., relaxing rules about how long a case may remain "open") in ways that make them better matched to meeting clients' initial needs; sustainability would benefit from allowing health and social care professionals flexibility when managing relationships with people and their families (e.g., enabling them to identify and respond to changes in clients' conditions and needs) and promote a co-production approach.…”