Beyond Chapter 4.7

Bandler, Lilon G

doi:10.1071/he15068

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In AHRE guidelines, “community engagement” is included as a key principle for researchers (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2018). Researchers working with Indigenous communities are recommended to demonstrate evidence of respectful engagement prior to the commencement of research (Bandler, 2015). This encourages greater uptake of research findings and the relevance and value of the research for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (Dudgeon et al, 2010).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combatting neo-Colonialism in Health Research: What can Aboriginal Health Research Ethics and Global Health Research Ethics Teach Each Other?

Harper

Pratt

2021

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ethics of research involving Aboriginal populations and low and middle-income country populations each developed out of a long history of exploitative research projects and partnerships. Commonalities and differences between the two fields have not yet been examined. This study undertook two independent literature searches for Aboriginal health research ethics and global health research ethics. Content analysis identified shared and differently emphasised ethical principles and concepts between the two fields. Shared ethical concepts like “benefit” and “capacity development” have been developed to guide collaborations in both Aboriginal health research and global health research. However, Aboriginal health research ethics gives much greater prominence to ethical principles that assist in decolonising research practice such as “self-determination”, “community-control”, and “community ownership”. The paper argues that global health research ethics would benefit from giving greater emphasis to these principles to guide research practice, while justice as approached in global health research ethics may inform Aboriginal health research practice. With increasing attention being drawn to the need to decolonise global health research, the lessons Aboriginal health research ethics can offer may be especially timely.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combatting neo-Colonialism in Health Research: What can Aboriginal Health Research Ethics and Global Health Research Ethics Teach Each Other?

Harper

Pratt

2021

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2 Lilon Bandler's provocative paper, 'Beyond Chapter 4.7', asks whether we should extend the ethical requirements for research engagement with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians to all research communities and participants. 3 All three papers acknowledge the need to consider values, ethical systems and health promotion practice within a cultural context.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ethics and health promotion: research, theory, policy and practice

Braunack-Mayer

Carter

2015

Health Prom J of Aust

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community engagement approaches for Indigenous health research: recommendations based on an integrative review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveCommunity engagement practices in Indigenous health research are promoted as a means of decolonising research, but there is no comprehensive synthesis of approaches in the literature. Our aim was to assemble and qualitatively synthesise a comprehensive list of actionable recommendations to enhance community engagement practices with Indigenous peoples in Canada, the USA, Australia and New Zealand.DesignIntegrative review of the literature in medical (Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Embase) and Google and WHO databases (search cut-off date 21 July 2020).Article selectionStudies that contained details regarding Indigenous community engagement frameworks, principles or practices in the field of health were included, with exclusion of non-English publications. Two reviewers independently screened the articles in duplicate and reviewed full-text articles.AnalysisRecommendations for community engagement approaches were extracted and thematically synthesised through content analysis.ResultsA total of 63 studies were included in the review, with 1345 individual recommendations extracted. These were synthesised into a list of 37 recommendations for community engagement approaches in Indigenous health research, categorised by stage of research. In addition, activities applicable to all phases of research were identified: partnership and trust building and active reflection.ConclusionsWe provide a comprehensive list of recommendations for Indigenous community engagement approaches in health research. A limitation of this review is that it may not address all aspects applicable to specific Indigenous community settings and contexts. We encourage anyone who does research with Indigenous communities to reflect on their practices, encouraging changes in research processes that are strengths based.

show abstract

Beyond Chapter 4.7

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Combatting neo-Colonialism in Health Research: What can Aboriginal Health Research Ethics and Global Health Research Ethics Teach Each Other?

Combatting neo-Colonialism in Health Research: What can Aboriginal Health Research Ethics and Global Health Research Ethics Teach Each Other?

Ethics and health promotion: research, theory, policy and practice

Community engagement approaches for Indigenous health research: recommendations based on an integrative review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About