2017
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1261687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Inclusion and Exclusion: Community Gardens as Spaces of Responsibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the Wijsgeren community garden shows processes of both social inclusion and social exclusion – operating together and simultaneously (see also van Holstein ; Neo & Chau ). The practices and experiences of gardeners and non‐gardeners in and around the community garden seem to produce processes of inclusion when building communities based on ownership and membership of the garden but also when increasing and improving social interaction in the neighbourhood public space beyond the garden(ing) confines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of the Wijsgeren community garden shows processes of both social inclusion and social exclusion – operating together and simultaneously (see also van Holstein ; Neo & Chau ). The practices and experiences of gardeners and non‐gardeners in and around the community garden seem to produce processes of inclusion when building communities based on ownership and membership of the garden but also when increasing and improving social interaction in the neighbourhood public space beyond the garden(ing) confines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, academic studies on community gardening have increasingly taken a more critical stance by also pointing to processes of social separation and exclusion (e.g. Glover 2004;Tan & Neo 2009;Tornaghi 2014;Veen 2015;van Holstein 2016;Neo & Chua 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create the social resistance landscape, we used sociodemographic information from 2011 to 2016 US Census Bureau's American Community Survey five year Census Block Group estimates for all three cities and selected important variables using a combination of a literature review and empirical statistical tools (Table 3). This approach is predicated on the knowledge that certain socio-demographic factors are known to act as barriers or conduits to social cohesion and connections between people in gardens 28,105,106 . First, we chose census variables a priori that impact social connectedness, particularly in relation to community gardening or cultural ecosystem services (Table 3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the urban scale the second approach could grant an operational space to many (new) citizens with new opportunities to support the maintenance of resources or adding immaterial activities. In fact green courts, open spaces and community gardens could represent a space where "to perform the dual functions of reconnecting urban residents with nature and strengthening the community" (Neo and Chua, 2017). In the past this linkage was fundamental in particular for self-supporting societies forced to rely on a balanced use of resources, but it seems to have disappeared into the contemporary urban realm.…”
Section: Pathways In Developments Of Governance As Learned From Tradimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here an active involvement in the management of land it is not anymore necessary. It has although to be said that opportunities like community gardens or urban orchards represent "a(s) spaces of responsibility" (Neo and Chua, 2017) and highly encourage practices of social inclusion, obviously paying attention to risks of appropriation by small group of individuals.…”
Section: Pathways In Developments Of Governance As Learned From Tradimentioning
confidence: 99%