2014
DOI: 10.5117/cms2014.1.schm
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond National Models?

Abstract: This comparison of Canada and Germany focuses on a particular dimension of these countries' respective approaches to governing migration and integration. It is guided by a key conceptual assumption: Cities and regions have become important laboratories for deliberating, developing, and implementing immigration and, in particular, integration policies. With this analytical lens, the article investigates the form and degree to which subnational levels of government have come to play a more prominent role in this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ungeachtet dieser Tatsache richtet die Forschung in den letzten Jahren ihren Blick verstärkt auf die lokale Dimension der Migrationspolitik. Aktuell werden sogar ein "local turn" proklamiert (Scholten/Penninx 2016;Hackett 2017; Zapata-Barrero/ Caponio/Scholten 2017) und zunehmend Divergenzen zwischen nationalstaatlichen und lokalen Migrationspolitiken dokumentiert (Faßmann/Kohlbacher 2014;Schmidtke 2014). Dabei zeigt sich, dass viele Städte proaktiver und offener gegenüber Zuwanderung agieren als die nationalstaatlichen Politiken.…”
Section: Problemstellung: Wachstumsund Integrationspolitiken Von Städtenunclassified
“…Ungeachtet dieser Tatsache richtet die Forschung in den letzten Jahren ihren Blick verstärkt auf die lokale Dimension der Migrationspolitik. Aktuell werden sogar ein "local turn" proklamiert (Scholten/Penninx 2016;Hackett 2017; Zapata-Barrero/ Caponio/Scholten 2017) und zunehmend Divergenzen zwischen nationalstaatlichen und lokalen Migrationspolitiken dokumentiert (Faßmann/Kohlbacher 2014;Schmidtke 2014). Dabei zeigt sich, dass viele Städte proaktiver und offener gegenüber Zuwanderung agieren als die nationalstaatlichen Politiken.…”
Section: Problemstellung: Wachstumsund Integrationspolitiken Von Städtenunclassified
“…There is also a spacial dimension, most processes taking place at the local level (Caponio & Borkert, 2010;Schmidtke, 2014), reflected in the local/national distinction in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Spacial and Temporal Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While traditionally integration research has focused on the national level, over the past decades growing attention has been given to the emerging role of cities. The "local turn of integration policies" (Caponio and Borkert, 2010) has been explained as a consequence of globalisation and the loss of importance of the nation-state (Penninx, 2008), as a result of decentralisation processes (Schmidtke, 2014) or simply because immigrants tend to settle in urban areas and therefore it is precisely there where the challenges are most pronounced (Penninx, 2009). Often in contrast to highly symbolic debates at the national level, local policies have been characterised by a rather "bottom-up place sensitive approach" and a "pragmatic logic of problemsolving" (Scholten and Penninx, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other comparative studies focused on specific aspects of local policy such as housing and segregation patterns (Musterd, Ostendorf and Breebaart, 1998), policing (Body-Gendrot, 2000), the institutionalisation of Islam (Rath et al, 2001) or the management of diversity in the implementation of local policies (Moore, 2001). In more recent years there have been a diversification of topics and cases, including studies on policy areas such as employment (Aybek, 2010;Vermeulen and Stotijn, 2010), education (Bruquetas-Callejo, 2014) or de-radicalisation (Van Heelsum, 2011) and taking cases beyond the more traditionally studied Western European cities (Crul and Holdaway, 2009;Foner et al, 2014;Schmidtke, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%