2016
DOI: 10.1111/etap.12218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Red Tape and Fools: Institutional Theory in Entrepreneurship Research, 1992-2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as we discussed early on in the paper, empirical findings have been far from consistent, creating doubts about the robustness of previously established relationships (Bjørnskov and Foss ; Su, Zhai, and Karlsson ; Terjesen, Hessels, and Li ; Thai and Turkina ). One possible explanation for this empirical heterogeneity is model uncertainty, and several independent reviews of the literature recognize that such heterogeneity has led to limited insights into the mechanisms that drive entrepreneurship (Bjørnskov and Foss ; Su, Zhai, and Karlsson ; Terjesen, Hessels, and Li ). Despite the tacit acknowledgment of the problem of model uncertainty, which is manifested by additional regression results with alternative specifications that scholars often report, traditional econometrics to a great extent has failed to exploit this systematic problem with applied empirical research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as we discussed early on in the paper, empirical findings have been far from consistent, creating doubts about the robustness of previously established relationships (Bjørnskov and Foss ; Su, Zhai, and Karlsson ; Terjesen, Hessels, and Li ; Thai and Turkina ). One possible explanation for this empirical heterogeneity is model uncertainty, and several independent reviews of the literature recognize that such heterogeneity has led to limited insights into the mechanisms that drive entrepreneurship (Bjørnskov and Foss ; Su, Zhai, and Karlsson ; Terjesen, Hessels, and Li ). Despite the tacit acknowledgment of the problem of model uncertainty, which is manifested by additional regression results with alternative specifications that scholars often report, traditional econometrics to a great extent has failed to exploit this systematic problem with applied empirical research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies have linked entrepreneurship to a number of important factors, including economic development (Audretsch and Acs ; Audretsch, Keilbach, and Lehmann ; Baumol and Strom ), cultural values (Tiessen ; Welter ), formal institutions (Bjørnskov and Foss ; Kreft and Sobel ; McMullen, Bagby, and Palich ; Nyström ), and even post‐materialistic values (Uhlaner and Thurik ) and role models (Bosma et al ). Despite this breadth of research, however, cross‐country empirical studies have so far provided less‐than‐complete insights into the mechanisms driving entrepreneurship (Bjørnskov and Foss ; Su, Zhai, and Karlsson ; Terjesen, Hessels, and Li ). A major issue in this literature has been that of model uncertainty—that is, the use of a wide variety of explanatory variables has produced inconsistent empirical findings (Terjesen, Hessels, and Li ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, emerging economies such as the African economy offer interesting contexts to study the effect of environment on entrepreneurship development. Institutional theory has become a lens through which numerous researchers have accounted for environmental influences on entrepreneurship, particularly in studies that relate to start-ups (Su et al, 2016). Naude (2010, p. 1) intimated that a country's institutional framework -the "rules of the game" -is important for understanding entrepreneurship growth.…”
Section: Theory and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study showcases how models of entrepreneurship that link macro‐level institutions to micro‐level individual intentions and activities can be enriched by acknowledging and integrating meso‐level social structures and related processes (Kim et al, ). In this way, our study may inspire future entrepreneurship research informed by institutional theory (Su et al, ). For instance, Audretsch et al (), have delineated how religious logics can help to explain the likelihood of individuals becoming self‐employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Institutional theory features prominently in entrepreneurship research in general (Su et al, 2017) and in research on academic entrepreneurship (Fini and Toschi, 2016) in particular. Until now, research in this domain has predominantly been focused on tracing entrepreneurial activities back to differences in institutional environments at the societal, field, population or organizational levels of analysis (Bruton et al, 2010;Su et al, 2017;Tolbert et al, 2011). While this research has generated valuable insights, our knowledge of the pathways that link higher-level institutions to the individual-level intentions that eventually generate entrepreneurial activities is still sparse (Kim et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%