2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01472.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Lynn White Thesis: Congregational Effects on Environmental Concern

Abstract: An extensive literature has explored the effects of religion on opinions about environmental protection and action on environmental issues, but has largely concerned itself with the effects of theology as inspired by the Lynn White thesis. However, religion is multifaceted and any complete study should also incorporate the social dimensions of religious experience. In this article, we employ a unique data set to demonstrate the varied informational effects of church membership on environmental attitudes. We fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(72 reference statements)
2
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Class differences likely explain why, although conservative Protestants are more likely to be politically conservative on issues of abortion and sexuality, they do not have more conservative views on economic issues such as redistribution (Davis & Robinson 1996b, Hart 1992, Johnson & Tamney 2001, Kiecolt 1988, Layman & Carmines 1997 and have variable opinions on social justice issues such as race relations (Davis & Robinson 1996b, Edgell & Tranby 2007, Emerson et al 1999, Kirkpatrick 1993, Read & Eagle 2011Wilcox 1990), peace and justice issues (Olson & Carroll 1992), and environmental issues (Biel & Nilsson 2005, Danielsen 2013, Djupe & Hunt 2009, Tarakeshwar et al 2001.…”
Section: Where the Consensus Ends And What The Consensus Might Be Obsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Class differences likely explain why, although conservative Protestants are more likely to be politically conservative on issues of abortion and sexuality, they do not have more conservative views on economic issues such as redistribution (Davis & Robinson 1996b, Hart 1992, Johnson & Tamney 2001, Kiecolt 1988, Layman & Carmines 1997 and have variable opinions on social justice issues such as race relations (Davis & Robinson 1996b, Edgell & Tranby 2007, Emerson et al 1999, Kirkpatrick 1993, Read & Eagle 2011Wilcox 1990), peace and justice issues (Olson & Carroll 1992), and environmental issues (Biel & Nilsson 2005, Danielsen 2013, Djupe & Hunt 2009, Tarakeshwar et al 2001.…”
Section: Where the Consensus Ends And What The Consensus Might Be Obsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…, ; Hand and Van Liere ; Schultz, Zelenzny, and Dalrymple ; Tarakeshwar et al. ; Woodrum and Hoban ), whereas others find a weak or no relationship between religious variables and environmental beliefs or behaviors (Boyd ; Djupe and Hunt ; Greeley ; Hayes and Marangudakis ; Kanagy and Nelsen ; Shaiko ; Sherkat and Ellison ; Wolkomir et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Djupe and Hunt (2009), in their analysis of the disparity between the pro-environmental views of clergy in the Episcopal (ECUSA) and Lutheran (ELCA) churches and the more conservative views regarding the envirorunent held by their congregations, ask whether clergy should 'communicate with the goal of reshaping beliefs about the meaning of religious texts or.. .speak directly about the nature of environmental problems?' (Djupe and Hunt 2009: 682).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%