2015
DOI: 10.1142/s2382626615500045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond the Square Root: Evidence for Logarithmic Dependence of Market Impact on Size and Participation Rate

Abstract: We make an extensive empirical study of the market impact of large orders (metaorders) executed in the U.S. equity market between 2007 and 2009. We show that the square root market impact formula, which is widely used in the industry and supported by previous published research, provides a good fit only across about two orders of magnitude in order size. A logarithmic functional form fits the data better, providing a good fit across almost five orders of magnitude. We introduce the concept of an "impact surfac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
117
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
14
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, market participants have only access to their own proprietary data (Bershova and Rakhlin 2013, Brokmann et al 2014, Toth et al 2011a) which leads to an unavoidable conditioning to their trading strategies (even though in some cases many different strategies are collated together so part of the conditioning may average out). Two notable exceptions do however exist: In Moro et al (2009) hidden metaorders are directly inferred from brokerage codes, while Zarinelli et al (2014) have unprecedented access to the start times, end times and volumes of a huge amount of metaorders stemming from Ancerno's clients 3 . In this paper, we use a dataset which allows on the contrary to identify each trade with a unique trader, thereby leading to a complete picture of the market.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, market participants have only access to their own proprietary data (Bershova and Rakhlin 2013, Brokmann et al 2014, Toth et al 2011a) which leads to an unavoidable conditioning to their trading strategies (even though in some cases many different strategies are collated together so part of the conditioning may average out). Two notable exceptions do however exist: In Moro et al (2009) hidden metaorders are directly inferred from brokerage codes, while Zarinelli et al (2014) have unprecedented access to the start times, end times and volumes of a huge amount of metaorders stemming from Ancerno's clients 3 . In this paper, we use a dataset which allows on the contrary to identify each trade with a unique trader, thereby leading to a complete picture of the market.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note in [Zarinelli et al, 2015], authors underline the potential influence of the trading rate on the market impact components. It allows to avoid sudden accelerated trading rates having an hidden influence on the price moves.…”
Section: The Main Metaorder Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy allows the trader to minimize costs whilst also minimizing the revelation of information to the rest of the market. The precise way in which it is optimal to split the large order (herein called metaorder ) [56] depends on the objective function and on the market impact model, i.e. the change in price conditioned on signed trade size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%