2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-8053-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bi-objective optimization of maintenance scheduling for power systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant stakeholders verified the results. Previous works such as by Denysiuk et al (2017), Hadjaissa et al (2016), Verma et al (2012), Masmoudi andHaït (2011), andCheung andHui (2002) are very limited to the specific equipment or focus on production or cost and do not take into account all maintenance jobs in MWM. Moreover, they do not incorporate such large number of constraints.…”
Section: Results Of the Proposed Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relevant stakeholders verified the results. Previous works such as by Denysiuk et al (2017), Hadjaissa et al (2016), Verma et al (2012), Masmoudi andHaït (2011), andCheung andHui (2002) are very limited to the specific equipment or focus on production or cost and do not take into account all maintenance jobs in MWM. Moreover, they do not incorporate such large number of constraints.…”
Section: Results Of the Proposed Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature in the maintenance scheduling and resource levelling is quite broad and Table 1 below highlights few of the works in this area. (Denysiuk et al, 2017) A multi-objective optimization model for optimizing maintenance schedules for pavements 2 (Hadjaissa et al, 2016) Methods to improve quality of energy production and reducing costs. Methods include mono-objective (make span), bi-objective (make span and training time) and modified genetic algorithm 3 (Verma et al, 2012) A non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-2) based multi-objective optimization approach for optimizing maintenance scheduling of machinery on ships 4 (Worrall and Mert, 1980) Dynamic decision rules for day-to-day scheduling in oil and gas sector, method to control backlog, and forecasting future work load 5 (Nurcahyo et al, 2019) Identification of key process areas in maintenance planning 6 (Jiu et al, 2013) Minimization of weighted sum of aversion of start time of maintenance, change over time, and train waiting time using mixed integer linear programming and hybrid genetic algorithm in coal industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing metaheuristic algorithms are also being modified to improve their solving capabilities. A Modified Genetic Algorithm is utilized in [21] to solve a bi-objective optimization problem.…”
Section: B Existing Solution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, changes to another EPA level causes major changes in the capacity and flexibility of staff in the department, but are difficult to include in the schedules due to the aggregation level of these schedules. For the lower EPA levels, tow scheduling (trainee and trainer) has to be applied, 895 Entrustable Professional Activities in Residency Programs -planning and scheduling issues while at higher EPA levels, single skilled operator scheduling would be possible (Hadjaissa, Ameur, Ait cheikh, & Essounbouli, 2016).…”
Section: Schedulers and Their Perceptions On The Residents' Schedulinmentioning
confidence: 99%