2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-006-0379-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias and precision of estimated glomerular filtration rate in children

Abstract: Determining true glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using an exogenous marker is time-consuming and cumbersome. Therefore, creatinine-based estimates of GFR are used. Recent papers using new population-specific/local parameters in their prediction equations, standardizing creatinine determination or adding other endogenous surrogate markers of GFR, like cystatin C, could demonstrate an improvement of bias inherent in the results of the prediction equations. Precision, however, is still poor. Currently, we have t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the precision of all the four equations are not satisfactory, according to the Bland-Altman Analysis (shown in Fig 1). This is in concordance with the published studies[25]. Currently, we have to accept a precision (as defined in the Bland-Altman plot) of ±20% in adults and ±30–40% in children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, the precision of all the four equations are not satisfactory, according to the Bland-Altman Analysis (shown in Fig 1). This is in concordance with the published studies[25]. Currently, we have to accept a precision (as defined in the Bland-Altman plot) of ±20% in adults and ±30–40% in children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Most of the equations in children are based on serum creatinine levels determined by the Jaffé method [9], and many of these have been established based on results obtained in small cohorts; consequently, they may lack precision [10]. An additional complicating factor is that in young children the use of a GFR formula is made more difficult by the rapid increase in GFR during the first year of life—approximately 20 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 at birth to 80–120 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 at 12 months [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In paediatric clinical practice, GFR has traditionally been estimated by serum or urine creatininebased methods. These methods, utilizing creatinine as a filtration marker, have well recognized inherent problems [2,3], which are amplified in children with spina bifida.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%