1997
DOI: 10.2307/1370488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias Associated with Diet Samples in Audouin's Gulls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, families with smaller, more fragile hard parts may still be underrepresented in fecal samples as they become more eroded and less identifiable as they pass through the stomach and intestines. (Gonzalez-Solis et al . 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, families with smaller, more fragile hard parts may still be underrepresented in fecal samples as they become more eroded and less identifiable as they pass through the stomach and intestines. (Gonzalez-Solis et al . 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the eggshells of Audouin’s gulls, Mn concentrations followed a different sequence (first egg < second egg > third egg; Morera et al 1997), and these discrepancies might be the result of different temporal variations in the available Mn for both gull species. Audouin’s gulls are mainly piscivorous (Gonzalez-Solis et al 1997; Morera et al 1997), while black-headed gulls are omnivorous (Cramp and Simmons 1983). Therefore, the main sources of Mn for black-headed gulls are common water macrophytes, which accumulate large amounts of this element (Samecka-Cymerman and Kempers 2000; Demirezen and Aksoy 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate potential differences between reproductive periods (when eggs and chicks of other species are available) and winter periods, pellets were collected during the winter (January and February 2022) and during the spring (May 2022). Given the difficulty of a correct identification of prey at the species level, class level was considered an appropriate identification level for Magpie prey (Oro et al 1997).…”
Section: Diet Datamentioning
confidence: 99%