2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias-corrected population, size distribution, and impact hazard for the near-Earth objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
245
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
22
245
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…where the model is normalized such that the cumulative number of objects brighter than H ¼ 18 is 960, which matches the Bottke et al (2002) model and other contemporary estimates (Stuart and Binzel 2004). There are clearly discrepancies between the two distributions, with the eccentricity of our synthetic population being concentrated toward higher values than those of the current known population.…”
Section: The Near-earth Objectssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…where the model is normalized such that the cumulative number of objects brighter than H ¼ 18 is 960, which matches the Bottke et al (2002) model and other contemporary estimates (Stuart and Binzel 2004). There are clearly discrepancies between the two distributions, with the eccentricity of our synthetic population being concentrated toward higher values than those of the current known population.…”
Section: The Near-earth Objectssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…To calibrate our Yarkovsky effect/resonance removal rate functions, we ran numerous CoDDEM simulations and compared our model NEO population to estimates of the observed population between 0.001 < D 10 km (Stokes et al 2003;Stuart & Binzel 2004). We found the above parameters produced a model NEO population that was a good match with observations.…”
Section: Collisional and Dynamical Depletion Evolution Model (Coddem)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…124 125 Figure 2 shows the cumulative number of impacts by bodies larger than 10 km in 126 diameter for three bombardment histories. The decreasing flux estimate is based on 127 dynamical erosion of the asteroid belt (Minton and Malhotra, 2010) and is scaled so that 128 the current impactor flux is equal to the impactor flux calculated based on observations of 129 NEOs (Stuart and Binzel, 2004). One minor difference between this work and that of 130…”
Section: ; Johnson and 44mentioning
confidence: 99%