2014
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias correction for hydrological impact studies – beyond the daily perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this quite weak performance of all the four satellite rainfall products, they provide spatio-temporal estimate of rainfall not available from gauges. Besides, that estimate can be improved by bias correction (Addor and Seibert 2014;AghaKouchak et al 2009;Müller and Thompson 2013) or by merged/blended improvements (Chappell et al 2013;Li and Shao 2010;Woldemeskel et al 2013) with gauge data as reference. Geophysical and climatological constraints (Jia et al 2011), such as elevation applied in this study, eventually also distance to the sea (Abtew et al 2011;Johansson and Chen 2003) and wind direction (Castro et al 2014), can also improve the performance of satellite rainfall products in contrast to climatology zonation that was not particularly beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this quite weak performance of all the four satellite rainfall products, they provide spatio-temporal estimate of rainfall not available from gauges. Besides, that estimate can be improved by bias correction (Addor and Seibert 2014;AghaKouchak et al 2009;Müller and Thompson 2013) or by merged/blended improvements (Chappell et al 2013;Li and Shao 2010;Woldemeskel et al 2013) with gauge data as reference. Geophysical and climatological constraints (Jia et al 2011), such as elevation applied in this study, eventually also distance to the sea (Abtew et al 2011;Johansson and Chen 2003) and wind direction (Castro et al 2014), can also improve the performance of satellite rainfall products in contrast to climatology zonation that was not particularly beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downscaling is sometimes combined with bias correction (e.g. , however several recent papers have cast doubt on the assumption that bias correction improves the reliability of results from subsequent hydrological modelling (Addor and Seibert 2014, Huang et al 2014, Ehret et al 2012. , as well as for snow modelling.…”
Section: Use Of Rcm Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of whether or not to apply a bias correction to overcome these biases in the climate models is widely discussed in the scientific community [25][26][27]. Bias correction is mostly limited to temperature and precipitation and leads (by definition) to a better agreement with the historical observations.…”
Section: Ensembles Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, bias correction methods affect the advantages of dynamic climate models, like the tempo-spatial coherence of the climate variables (covariance structure) and the compliance of physical conservation principles [27,28]. Additionally, bias corrections are based on the assumption that statistical errors remain stationary in the future, but the bias will not necessarily stay the same in the next decades [25][26][27][28][29]. Hence, it is not certain if a bias correction leads to more realistic results in hydrological impact studies [30].…”
Section: Ensembles Climate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%