2005
DOI: 10.1080/01966324.2005.10737651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bias Corrections of some Criteria for Selecting Multivariate Linear Models in a General Nonnormal Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there is no assumption of a concrete distribution in the definition of C p , using C p may be more suitable for selecting variables in nonnormal data. However, Fujikoshi and Satoh (1997) and Fujikoshi et al (2003Fujikoshi et al ( , 2005 reported that the selectionprobability of a bias-corrected C p is lower than that of a bias-corrected AIC. In summary,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is no assumption of a concrete distribution in the definition of C p , using C p may be more suitable for selecting variables in nonnormal data. However, Fujikoshi and Satoh (1997) and Fujikoshi et al (2003Fujikoshi et al ( , 2005 reported that the selectionprobability of a bias-corrected C p is lower than that of a bias-corrected AIC. In summary,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the result in Fujikoshi et al [5], if the candidate model is the overspecified model, the risk R KL in (3) is expanded as…”
Section: Theorem 32 Let Be a Noncentrality Parameter Matrix Defined Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the same calculation as in Fujikoshi et al [5], which is an asymptotic expansion with respect to the expectations of Z and V having asymptotic normality, where…”
Section: Theorem 32 Let Be a Noncentrality Parameter Matrix Defined Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we will consider primarily the above five criteria, the family also includes information criteria for which the penalty terms are random variables, e.g., the modified AIC (MAIC) proposed by Fujikoshi and Satoh (1997), Takeuchi's information criterion (TIC) proposed by Takeuchi (1976), the extended information criterion (EIC) proposed by Ishiguro et al (1997), the cross-validation (CV) criterion proposed by Stone (1974Stone ( , 1977, and other bias-corrected AICs, such as those proposed by Fujikoshi et al (2005), Yanagihara (2006), and Yanagihara et al (2011) (for the details of those criteria, see Yanagihara et al (2013)). The best subset of ω, which is chosen by minimizing IC m (j), is written aŝ…”
Section: Notation and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%